My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0418
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:29 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 9:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/18/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 04/18/05 <br />Minutes - Page 12 <br /> <br />was needed at a future Study Session. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder requested further clarification and <br />description of some items listed in the priority list; with Council <br />consensus that individual Councilmembers seek further <br />clarification directly from staff, rather than additional staff <br />presentations at a Council meeting. <br /> <br />Discussion included definition of the ranking system and <br />process; and further need to define additional issues individually <br />prior to group ranking. <br /> <br />Councilmembers agreed to provide staff (Margaret) with their <br />individual comments and priorities by April 27, 2005 to allow <br />staff to compile a comprehensive listing for further Council <br />consideration. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Discuss Sale of City Property <br />Mayor Klausing referenced the legal opinion rendered by the <br />City Attorney, dated April 13, 2005, related to disposal of <br />surplus or excess City property, and requested a summary from <br />City Attorney Anderson. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson provided an overview of their <br />determination of when City Council authorization was required <br />for sale of surplus City property, specifically legal thresholds in <br />terms of dollar value, based on state statute in general, statues <br />related to Statutory B cities, and City ordinance; in addition to <br />real estate. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined the City Council needed to be <br />more involved in determining disposal, even if the City Manager <br />was given discretion, with the City Council serving as caretakers <br />of public property. Councilmember Kough provided a bench <br />handout entitled, "Proposed Resolution by Councilman Tom <br />Kough, April 18, 2005, Disposal of Surplus or Excess City <br />Property;" for Council consideration. Councilmember Kough <br />proposed: <br />1) Control of Finances and Property: <br />The City Council would have management and control of the <br />finances, and all the property of the City, both real and <br /> <br />Discuss Sale of City <br />Property <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.