Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Study Session - 04/18/05 <br />Minutes - Page 15 <br /> <br />Redevelopment, but opined such discussions at this time would <br />be premature until it was determined what the actual <br />development would be. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka concurred with Councilmember <br />Schroeder's comments, noting that the Parks and Recreation <br />Commission was very cognizant of needs of the park and the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmembers Schroeder and <br />Maschka, noting that additional housing units, park users and <br />stakeholders needed to be brought into the discussion process at <br />a later date for consideration. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern that the process she <br />wanted should be in place before the development process. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that the developer had been instructed that <br />Langton Lake Park was "off limits" with their directive that the <br />park remain untouched. <br /> <br />Further discussion included proposed Twin Lakes Pathway along <br />the southern park boundary; realignment of Parkway; and the <br />proposed role of a task force at this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder concurred, up to a point, with <br />Councilmember Ihlan' s process, but opined that further <br />information was necessary as to what the Twin Lakes <br />Development would look like. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that there appeared to be City Council <br />support for looking at the Langton Lake Park Master Plan at a <br />later date, but such consideration was premature at this point. <br />