My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0418
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:29 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 9:56:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/18/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 04/18/05 <br />Minutes - Page 4 <br /> <br />of a one to two percent discount for implementation of a <br />wellness program for the City. Ms. Bacon anticipated that the <br />program would pay for itself. <br /> <br />Discussion included various tests to determine participation and <br />compliance; various incentives, their advantages and <br />disadvantages; encouragement of citizen and Councilmember <br />participation by advertising the program in various City media <br />sources; whether it was appropriate for financial incentives, or <br />whether vacation time, health reimbursement account or tuition <br />reimbursement would be more favorable; and ways to offset <br />costs. <br /> <br />Council consensus appeared to be support for implementation of <br />the program. Staff advised that the item would therefore be <br />placed as an action item on the April 25, 2005 Council agenda. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Review and Discuss Draft Ordinance Amending Title Five, <br />Section 501.16 of the Roseville City Code relating to <br />Dangerous Animals <br />Police Chief Carol Sletner advised Councilmembers that she had <br />revised the ordinance, based on past comments and suggestions <br />from the City Council, and requested three components for <br />Council consideration related to the revised ordinance: <br />I) changing wording of ordinance from dogs to animals, in <br />order to be more proactive and respond to all potential <br />animal bites and complaints and not just those involving <br />dogs; <br />2) specifics of proper enclosures and differing viewpoints <br />involved (i.e., inclusion of food/water); <br />3) the importance of registration of potentially dangerous <br />animals. Chief Sletner noted that last week, a dog had <br />bitten a jogger, the second incident for that particular <br />animal, and the need to identify the animal as potentially <br />dangerous. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined that he was concerned about who <br />would serve as a designee to determine the appropriateness of an <br />animal's behavior and their expertise to make such a <br />determination; expressed concern regarding the common nature <br />of dogs reacting to unusual or loud noises; the size stipulations <br /> <br />Review and Discuss <br />Draft Ordinance <br />Amending Title <br />Five, Section 501.16 <br />of the Roseville <br />City Code relating <br />to Dangerous <br />Animals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.