My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0321
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:41 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 11:44:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/21/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 03/21/05 <br />Minutes - Page 11 <br /> <br />Item Amount <br />Park Signs $20,000 <br />Playground Equipment (Sandcastle Park) 30,000 <br />Rosebrook Field Lighting 50,000 <br />Tennis court resurface (Victoria) 15,000 <br />Athletic Field Upgrades Victoria Dredging 15,000 <br />Landscaping 10,000 <br />Amenities Picnic table, grills 5,000 <br />Bleacher pads, Victoria 2, Legion Field 5,000 <br /> <br />Discussion included use of pervious or impervious surfaces; park <br />sign enhancements; feasibility of a golf driving range at the <br />OV AL during the summer; elimination of previous debt in this <br />fund; original source of bonding monies for the fund; future <br />Study Session agenda item related to the scope for projected <br />implementation over a five-year period of the outstanding capital <br />projects (i.e., replacement of warming houses/shelters); changing <br />uses of area parks; Master Plan development or redevelopment in <br />specific neighborhoods; updated community and neighborhood <br />input on park uses and their reactions to overall individual park <br />plans and systems. <br /> <br />6. <br /> <br />Public Works-City Hall Building Project: A Recap <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz, in his capacity as <br />Project Manager for the project, provided a final recap of the <br />budget for the project and the overall observations of the <br />construction experience. Mr. Schwartz reviewed various <br />components and goals of the project: <br /> <br />Project Delivery <br />· Construction management versus hard bid awarded to one <br />general contractor; <br />· Minimize number of poorly performing subcontractors <br />versus change of getting poorly performing general <br />contractor; <br />· Ability to choose construction manager based on <br />qualifications. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz concluded that, overall, subcontractors performed <br />adequately and that for the most part, the construction <br />management method worked out well. <br /> <br />Recap <br />Public Works <br />City Hall <br />Building Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.