My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0321
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0321
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:41 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 11:44:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/21/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 03/21/05 <br />Minutes - Page 21 <br /> <br />consensus. Council consensus was that all applicants be <br />interviewed (4/1 - Klausing). <br /> <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn questioned the appointment process related to <br />the interviews, referencing the resolution; the invitation and <br />attendance of Vice Chairs and Chairs of various commissions <br />and his observation that only one had been in attendance. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding interview and appointment <br />scheduling; and time allotted to interviews. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hedtke opined his reading of the resolution would <br />be that the City Council meeting following interviews, could <br />indeed by that meeting held the same night (i.e., business <br />meeting beginning at 8:00 p.m. following applicant interviews). <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder advised he could not arrive prior to <br />5 :00 p.m. on a weeknight; and that Saturday attendance at a <br />meeting proved problematic for him. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing recognized Councilmember Schroeder's <br />scheduling concerns, and requested that he review the video tape <br />of the interviews for those he was unable to attend in person. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to schedule the next Council meeting to start <br />at 4:00 p.m. for the purpose of interviewing the remaining <br />candidates; with the regular business meeting moved to 8:00 <br />p.m. <br /> <br />13. <br /> <br />Update and Discussion on Pending Twin Lakes Litigation, <br />and Payment of Attorney's Fees <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that, at the last regular City Council <br />meeting during Check Register Approval, she had questioned <br />whether attorney fees related to Twin Lakes negotiations would <br />be charged against future Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds. <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned when the City Council had <br />discussed such a decision, or when that policy was adopted. <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her previously-expressed <br />concerns related to policy and legality issues and their <br />appropriateness. Councilmember Ihlan requested a legal opinion <br /> <br />Update and <br />Discussion <br />Pending Twin <br />Lakes Litigation, <br />Payment of <br />Attorney's Fees <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.