My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0214
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0214
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:24:56 AM
Creation date
5/12/2005 12:38:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/14/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 02/14/05 <br />Minutes - Page 17 <br /> <br />4. Costs of all necessary environmental clean-up/environmental impact <br /> mitigation in connection with the redevelopment; <br />5. Costs of all consultant and other professional services in connection <br /> with the proposed redevelopment and Rottlund's application for TIF <br /> and other public subsidies; <br />6. Costs of defending litigation concernmg the proposed <br /> redevelopment; <br />7. Losses of future tax revenue to the City due to TIF and other public <br /> subsidies requested by Rottlund; and losses of current tax revenue <br /> due to hazardous substances sub-districts; <br />8. Costs of issuing TIF Revenue Bonds, including interest and other <br /> debts service costs, and analysis of impact on City debt load and <br /> bonding capacity. <br />The fiscal impacts analysis shall be completed before the City Council <br />takes any action to approve Rottlund's application for TIF and other <br />public subsidies for the Twin Lakes project, and before the City Council <br />takes any further action to approve or issue permits for the Twin Lakes <br />proiect. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in OpposItIOn to the motion, <br />opining that it stated the obvious and the referenced issues would <br />be addressed in the process currently in progress. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing questioned City Manager Beets as to how staff <br />could quantify the referenced costs related to general fiscal <br />impacts. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets stated that a number of the referenced items <br />had been already analyzed as part of the pro forma provided by <br />Mr. Casserly on the City's behalf; noting that further refinement <br />would be part of the normal course of business once an <br />Infrastructure or Planned Unit Development (PUD) Agreement <br />had been drafted; once it was determined that a project would be <br />going forward, after a Redevelopment Agreement had been <br />negotiated. Mr. Beets cautioned Councilmembers that the <br />majority of the numbers were in a constant state of refinement <br />and should only be considered as estimates until more definitive <br />costs were available in the process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.