My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005_0516_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2005
>
2005_0516_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2010 2:15:26 PM
Creation date
5/12/2005 4:54:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Agenda/Packets
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Discussion Issues <br />The immediate issue before the Council is whether to expand the Utility Fee Discount Program <br />to include owner-occupied, multi-family housing. However, it's difficult to assess the issue <br />without looking at the broader public policy implications of the Program itself, and whether <br />other aspects warrant further consideration. <br />With any public assistance program, it's important to reflect upon why the program was created <br />in the first place. In this particular case, the Program was created to achieve a specific outcome - <br />to encourage homeowners to connect to the municipal water system and to provide assistance for <br />those that have limited financial means. Clearly the primary objective was achieved long ago. <br />One might conclude that the only remaining objective is to provide assistance to those that have <br />limited means. <br />Public Policy Issues <br />The issue of whether to expand the Discount Program has many public policy implications. In <br />the interest of facilitating discussion, the following talking points are submitted: <br />1) If the Program's original objective has been achieved (which appears to be the case), <br />then what are the Program's current objectives? <br />2) The Program is a public assistance program -which are designed to redistribute <br />financial resources to those will lesser financial means. Is this type of program suited <br />for the municipal level or are their other forms of government that could do it better? <br />3) At an effective discount of $36 annually, does the Program make an economic <br />difference? <br />4) Currently, Program recipients qualify on the "Honor" system. Aside from property <br />ownership verification, there are no efforts to authenticate whether submitted <br />information is accurate. Is this acceptable? <br />Staff is prepared to facilitate a discussion on each of these policy issues. In an effort to provide <br />the Council with greater background, supplemental information is presented below. <br />Current Program Enrollees <br />Currently, 20% of all single-family homeowners receive the discount. This amounts to <br />approximately $85,000 in annual costs that are redistributed to those that do not receive the <br />discount. Our records indicate that of the homes that receive the discount, 100% of them <br />qualified under the "retiree" criteria. <br />Expanding the Program to include owner-occupied multi-family housing units would increase <br />the eligible housing units by approximately 1,000. Assuming that all eligible units took <br />advantage of the Program, the annual costs that get redistributed could rise to a total of $120,000 <br />annually. <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.