2012-01-03_PR_Comm Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 2012 3 ROSEVILLE CITY HALL—6:30PM 4 5 6 PRESENT: Azer, Boehm, Diedrick, Doneen, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt, Pederson, and Ristow 7 ABSENT: Simbeck emailed ahead with excused absence 9 STAFF: Anfang, Brokke, Evenson 10 1. INTRODUCTIONS/ROLL CALL/PUBLIC COMMENT 11 Walmart Representatives in attendance, made no comments. 13 No public comment 14 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—DECEMBER 6, 2011 MEETING 15 Commission Recommendation: 16 Minutes for the December 6, 2011 meeting were approved unanimously. 17 18 3. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TASK FORCE REPORT 19 Doneen gave a brief update of recent activities from the Community Engagement Task 20 Force. The Task Force continues with their work focused on the upcoming presentation to 21 the Council. Doneen recognized the efforts of Gary Grefenberg in moving the Community 22 Engagement process forward. 23 24 4. PARK DEDICATION - WALMART 25 Etten continued the discussion of park dedication considerations for the proposed Walmart 26 development in Twin Lakes. Earlier considerations included a parcel of land in an area away 27 from the development that might have served as a nice addition to Langton Lake Park. This 28 land dedication is no longer an option to fiilfill the park dedication requirements. Etten also 29 clarified that the actual size of the parcel is 13.94 acres, rather than the 17.8 acres reported 30 earlier. This change in size is due to 3.86 acres being sold earlier to the City for the Twin 31 Lakes Parkway. The updated land equivalency for park dedication is .68 acres and the 32 updated cash payment would be $411,115, based on 5% of the FMV. 33 Commission Recommendation: 34 Motion by Doneen, second by Ristow to recommend the Roseville City Council accept cash in lieu of land for park dedication in the proposed Walmart development. 37 Commission questions followed. 38 ■ D. Holt inquired into what the land options were/are for the site. Brokke explained 39 that there were no appropriate park development options for this site. 40 ■ Azer asked for a clarification of how the park dedication fiinds can be used. Brokke 41 clarified that the fiinds cannot be used for maintenance or ongoing costs but can be 42 used for land acquisitions, park development, and facility enhancement. The park 43 dedication fiinds could be used to fiirther expand the projects identified by the Parks 44 and Recreation Renewal Program. 45 Motion passed unanimously. 46 Note: Greg Simbeck favored the cash in lieu of land option through his email to notify staff 47 of his absence from tonight's meeting. 48 49