My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-01-03_PR_Comm Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Minutes
>
2012
>
2012-01-03_PR_Comm Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2012 4:40:07 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 4:40:01 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 5. MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION <br /> 51 Commission Chair Etten informed the Commission of the impending court hearing for the <br /> 52 most recent appeal of the City Bond process. This hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, <br /> 53 February 8, 2012. Brokke announced that the first round of Bonds were sold on December <br /> 54 29, 2011. The money has been secured and the bond requirement clock has begun, but the <br /> 55 funds are not available until after the February, 8, 2012 hearing and the subsequent riling. <br /> 56 ■ D. Holt voiced his frustration with the citizen group that has filed the appeals. <br /> 57 Because of the appeals the interest rate for the first bond release increased from <br /> 58 2.15%to 2.45% costing the City an additional $260,000 in interest costs. Holt feels it <br /> 59 is important that the community know the impact of this group's actions. <br /> 60 ■ Ristow and other Commissioners inquired into the possibility of a counter suit to help <br /> 61 cover damages caused by these appeals. Brokke explained that is a Council action and <br /> 62 will be left to their choice in how to best handle the situation. <br /> 63 Ristow mentioned how this is similar to past Twin Lakes actions that <br /> 64 resulted in the development falling through. Ristow feels that it is <br /> 65 important that Roseville Citizens realize that their elected officials <br /> 66 were selected to make decisions. <br /> 67 Commissioners would like to remind the community of upcoming Master Plan Renewal <br /> 68 Community and Neighborhood meetings. Community involvement has been the cornerstone <br /> 69 for the Master Plan process from the beginning and will continue through the upcoming <br /> 70 Renewal Process. <br /> 71 ■ January 25 — 7pm at the Roseville Skating Center, Rose Room. This meeting will <br /> 72 feature updates on renewal program projects, project timeline for the coming four <br /> 73 years and information on the fiunding schedule. <br /> 74 ■ February 8 — 6:30pm at the Roseville Skating Center, Rose Room. This <br /> 75 Neighborhood and Community Meeting will focus on Lexington Park Improvements <br /> 76 and plans for projects there in 2012. <br /> 77 ■ February 15 — 6:30pm at the Harriet Alexander nature Center. This Neighborhood <br /> 78 and Community Meeting will focus on HANC Improvements and plans for projects <br /> 79 there in 2012, including the replacement of the boardwalk, HVAC improvements, <br /> 80 other possible interior work and natural resource restoration on site. <br /> 81 <br /> 82 The first major decision in the Parks and Recreation Renewal Program is to consider a <br /> 83 general procurement method. Staff is proceeding cautiously until after the February Stn <br /> 84 hearing. Work needs to take place during this waiting period to allow us to maintain the <br /> 85 aggressive timeline set to accommodate the bond requirements. Brokke briefed the <br /> 86 commission on the three options scheduled to be presented to the Council on Monday, <br /> 87 January 9, 2012. Staff has identified pros and cons for each method and will look to the <br /> 88 Council for direction. The goal is to select a process that gets the best development program <br /> 89 for the City. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Renewal Program aims to get good <br /> 90 projects for a good price for a long period of time. <br /> 91 Best Value (BV) was the method used during for the Skating Center Geothermal <br /> 92 project. The Best Value Procurement System is facilitated by Arizona State <br /> 93 University. With this program ASU assists in the development of RFPs and guidance <br /> 94 with the selection of contractor, consultant and design work as well as producing <br /> 95 weekly reports and project progress reports. The Best Value system through ASU is <br /> 96 known for its on-time, on-budget record (98%). With BV, the City accepts proposals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.