2011-05-26_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

memo 5of11 Response The Implementation Plan does this in the following two ways: (1) under the monitoring program, specific monitoring tasks to be conducted by the cities are provided in RED and (2) implementation activities that the GLWMO expects financial assistance to conduct are flagged by providing a 50% cost share note in the " GLWMO cost share" column. This will be articulated on page 94 and made clearer in the Implementation Plan. Comment (TP) I recommend the GLWMO wetland policy include language that requires that all wetland impacts (within GLWMO) are replaced within the GLWMO watershed or other GLWMO Board approved location if no site can be found in GLWMO. I would hope that a Wetland Replacement Plan could be part of the GLWMO Wetland Management Plan. Note: I would assume that an amendment to the GLWMO Plan will be required to include specific management criteria that will transcend WCA rules. Response A statement re: preferences for wetland replacement (no net loss in the drainage area, watershed, etc.) will be added to Section 5.2.2 Wetland Management (page 100). In addition, the Wetland Management Plan would address wetlands replacement and yes, an amendment would be required to adopt the wetland management plan and specific management criteria that transcend WCA rules. Issues Identification Comment (KE) Add lake levels to the issue summary for Snail Lake Response This change will be made to the plan Comment (JM) Page 120 - Under 1.19.g Lake Judy should be Bennett Lake Response This change will be made to the plan Comment (TM) Page 120 - It is mentioned that the City of Roseville installed a BMP on Lake Emily, is this correct as Emily is in Shoreview? Response This will be corrected in next draft of the plan Comment (JM) Page 133 - "a sense of responsibility or ownership which can negatively" should read "a sense of responsibility or ownership, which can negatively" Response This change will be made to the plan Comment (DS) 1.19d Conducting a fish kill will potentially be an issue for the City of Roseville Parks Department as well as the Minnesota DNR Response No change needed Comment (DS) Last sentence of the issue summary for stormwater management (page 130) implies that the communities do not have stormwater management standards in place. Response While there is a sentence earlier in the issue summary paragraph (page 129 that states The cities of Roseville and Shoreview currently implement stormwater management rules and conduct maintenance activities to insure the performance of stormwater management Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. 651 Hale Ave N, Oakdale, MN 55128 p: 651.770.8448 f: 651.770.2552 www.eorinc.com