My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-16_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-02-16_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 11:09:26 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 11:07:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/16/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tLake Vegetation Management Plan <br />The 15% limit is a level of plant control the DNR has confidence in that will allow riparian owners <br />access to the lake while maintaining the basic functions and benefits that aquatic plants provide. Most <br />lakes never reach the 15% limit for chemical control of aquatic plants. A variance is required to remove <br />more than 15% of the littoral area and monitoring of the plant community and the water quality is <br />required to ensure that cumulative impacts of aquatic plant removal are not resulting in harm to the lake. <br />One of the situations the DNR considers issuing a variance to the 15% limit is for the selective control <br />of invasive species to enhance ecological and recreational benefits. Currently, Eurasian Watermilfoil <br />makes up a significant proportion of the plant community and could be an ecological and recreational <br />nuisance on Lake Owasso. <br />The overall diversity of native submersed plants, as measured by the mean number of native species per <br />point (littoral zone), will be maintained or allowed to increase in the first year after bay -wide treatment. <br />The mean number of native species per point may decrease during the year of bay -wide treatment. If the <br />mean number of native species per point decreases during a year of bay -wide treatment, it is possible <br />that bay -wide treatments may not be done during at least the first year following a bay -wide treatment in <br />order to meet Goal 3. Bay -wide treatments may be repeated at intervals of every other to every third <br />year, depending on trends in the frequencies of the target invasive plants and also non - target native <br />plants. If the mean number of native species per point does not decrease during the first year of bay - <br />wide treatment, then bay -wide treatments may be considered during the following year <br />Monitoring data will be collected as described below. <br />❑ Variance approved without condition(s) <br />® Variance approved with following conditions(s): <br />® Pre - treatment data collection <br />Narrative: <br />Two pre - treatment point- intercept plant surveys and water quality data were collected by the Grass Lake <br />WMO to serve as baseline data to compare the effectiveness of the treatment regime and to determine <br />the impacts on the lake.. <br />During each year of bay -wide treatment, the Lake Owasso Associations or its agent will inspect the lake <br />prior to treatment to delineate areas to be treated. If any deviations from the most recent inventories are <br />observed during pre - treatment inspections, these results should be noted and the treatments adjusted <br />accordingly, in a manner consistent with the APM permit issued by the MnDNR. Treatment areas <br />should be delineated using GPS and Geographic Digital Data, including all necessary electronic files, <br />will be submitted to the DNR to enable re- creation with GIS software of all polygons, waypoints, track <br />logs, etc. <br />Lake Owasso LVMP 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.