My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-16_AgendaPacket
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Agendas and Packets
>
201x
>
2012
>
2012-02-16_AgendaPacket
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 11:09:26 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 11:07:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Agenda/Packet
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/16/2012
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
tLake Vegetation Management Plan <br />® Posttreatment data collection <br />Narrative: <br />At least one point- intercept survey will occur annually during the peak growth of native vegetation (late <br />June through August). Reliable water quality data must also be collected throughout the season. The <br />survey reports and water quality data must be provided to the DNR, the lake association, and other <br />interested parties by 31 December of each year. It will be the responsibility of the lake association to <br />make sure a point intercept is conducted. (Currently the Grass lake WMO has been conductiong point - <br />intercept surveys). <br />® Evaluation <br />Narrative: <br />The DNR, in conjunction with other interested parties, will review the point- intercept survey(s) and <br />water quality results annually. If the point- intercept surveys or water quality data reveal that the <br />treatments appear to be producing results that do not meet the goals of this plan, then the approach to <br />control may be revised at the discretion of the DNR. Examples of reasons to revise the approach may <br />include, but are not limited to, notable decreases in water quality or obvious decreases in native <br />vegetation. If treatments need to be modified, the DNR will work with the associations to develop an <br />alternative management strategy. <br />F-1 Requirements for Signature Waiver: <br />Narrative: <br />Currently a waiver for signature is not authorized. <br />If a waiver for the signature requirement is issued under MS 103G.615 Subp 3a(b) an alternative form of <br />notification is required. The allowed alternate forms of notification are a news releases or public notices <br />in a local newspaper, a public meeting, or a mailing to the most recent permanent address of affected <br />landowners. The notification must be given annually and must include: the proposed date of treatment, <br />the target species, the method of control or product being used, and instructions on how the landowner <br />may request that control not occur adjacent to the landowner's property. <br />® Conditions of permits [limits on amounts of area to be treated, method and timing of <br />control, etc]: <br />Product(s): Herbicides to be used may include endothall (such as Aquathol K or Aquathol Super <br />K) for curlyleaf pondweed (CLP) and Auxin mimic (such as 2,4 D and Triclopyr) for Eurasian <br />Watermilfoil (EWM) or others. Protocols describing our current understanding of selective treatments <br />including: target concentraion, timing of application and frequency of treatments are attached in <br />Appendix 1. <br />® Other: <br />Narrative: <br />Additional information is contained in the following appendices: <br />Lake Owasso LVMP 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.