2012-02-16_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 that by getting bids now (in February) before they got busy, and before spring thaw, to get the projects completed within the proposed nine (9) month timeframe (current date through October 2012. Mr. Petersen suggested, as a safety valve, that monies could be escrowed post - sunset of the GLWMO with authority given to member cities where a project resided. Mr. Petersen noted that two (2) projects had already received approval by the GLWMO Board: Iwan Property at $1,000.00; and Reiland $Property at $1,000.00. Chair Miller stated that he was supportive of those with plan designs in place however, he was concerned about casting a wider net to solicit more proj GLWMO Board remain focus on those pending plans and providing an opportutq Motion 12- 0111-03 Member Von De Linde moved, and Member Barrett seconded, in encumbered for pending projects, approval of allocating an addirio design/planning stages with the RCD, contingent upon those p it agreements by the June 14, 2012 GLWMO meeting date the completed, and approved by the GLWMO Board by their funding; and authorizing the Chair to sign a revised Technica Conservation District (RCD) for additional technical service supp exceed $5,000.00. Discussion ensued on contract and construction/ Ayes: 3 Nays: 0 Motion carried. Mr. Petersen had provided a list of in his Memorandum dated Januag Subwatershed RetroAprov Mr. Petersen suggeste conservation activitie Petersen explained at these would serve t h rM opportunity; preferring that the ,their completion. to the c 7,100.00 �0 for pro' is still in the entering into cost -share ,*with all projects installed, meeting to be considered for Agreement with the Ramsey RCD in an amount not to their feasibility. )ns neede 'n e near future by the GLWMO Board, as detailed 12; d inc d in agenda packet materials. RKRqWard consider expending some of their remaining funds on ificant data on where to locate BMP's to be most effective. Mr. p k at small geographic areas in larger geographic watersheds and tlable through the UAA/BARR studies that had identified the most Lake Owasso. Mr. Petersen advised that Mike Goodnature of the RCD h rovided a pro al for identifying effective BMP areas draining to Lake Owasso, at a cost of appr rely $12,000. with the work done within two (2) months. Mr. Petersen noted that Mr. G anticipate tate cost -share funding through grant funds of approximately $3,000.00 to reduce th ct costo Mr. Petersen s e in support of the GLWMO Board pursuing the analysis, noting that this would leave member citie particularly the City of Roseville, and the future governing organization with good information with which to move forward on Lake Owasso's phosphorus loading issues. Mr. Petersen noted that Ramsey/Washington WSD has used this type of data to guide their operations; and if they were to be the governing agency, this analysis would lead to grants for them in completing this work. Discussion among members included how the study differed from the WRAPP in greater detail; with Mr. Schwartz advising that this analysis would be different than the WRAPP, as it would be more site - specific for local areas rather than the WRAPP's creation of specific load applications for watersheds to water bodies.