Laserfiche WebLink
255 <br />256 <br />257 <br />258 <br />259 <br />260 <br />261 <br />262 <br />263 <br />264 <br />265 <br />266 <br />267 <br />268 <br />269 <br />270 <br />271 <br />272 <br />273 <br />274 <br />275 <br />276 <br />277 <br />278 <br />279 <br />280 <br />281 <br />282 <br />283 <br />284 <br />285 <br />286 <br />287 <br />288 <br />289 <br />290 <br />291 <br />292 <br />293 <br />294 <br />295 <br />296 <br />297 <br />298 <br />299 <br />300 <br />301 <br />302 <br />303 <br />304 <br />305 <br />Mr. Petersen concurred, advising that this would identify the best BMP opportunities, allowing <br />significantly more phosphorus to be removed from the system. <br />Chair Miller expressed concern with how each engineering firm and each district or organization had a <br />different approach; and was hesitant prior to talking to either Ramsey/Washington or Vadnais Lakes Area <br />WMO to proceed until they offered their opinion of the value of the analysis and whether they supported <br />the GLWMO moving forward at this time. If they offered their support, Chair Miller advised that he <br />would be in favor of proceeding. <br />Mr. Petersen suggested that both organizations be approached for their comments, afAested that the <br />GLWMO Board authorize encumbering $9,000.00 and authorizing the Chair to ecute an agreement <br />with RCD to perform the analysis, pending the outcome of those discussions wi WMO's. <br />Mr. Johnson advised that the RCD did an assessment for VLAWMO aro Lambe w ich was <br />found very valuable to use on several occasions when seekiAggrant ' g for vario ects. M r. <br />Johnson referenced another assessment they had done for Rmgton around Casey Lake <br />subwatershed, with that data also providing of value. Mdvised that SR was also <br />supportive of such assessments. <br />Motion 12- 0111-04 <br />Member Barrett moved, and Member Von De Linde seconded appr <br />exceed $9,000.00 in remaining GLWMO funds for a Subwatershed <br />Owasso drainage areas at a total estimated cost 000.00 for con <br />project funding to be a cost -share match betwee <br />the Chair to execute an agreement with the RCD r the' se <br />discussion with and support of the Ramsey/Wash' to d V ais 2 <br />Ayes:3 Nays:0 <br />Education/Outreach <br />Mr. Petersen sought it <br />member cities. <br />Member Barrett <br />date from and,ak <br />De Linde <br />Mr. Scht <br />remained <br />carried. <br />Vumbering an amount not to <br />fit Analysis of the south Lk. <br />etion within two (2) month; with <br />/MO as discussed; and authorizing <br />rvices;contingent upon satisfactory <br />xea WMO's for those studies. <br />to pursue educational and outreach opportunities with <br />at the public hearing about the lack of communication to- <br />in support of partnering with member cities for workshops in Roseville <br />in Shoreview. <br />the City of Roseville had nothing of that nature planned at this time; however, <br />bilitv in the future. <br />Action Step <br />Chair Miller asked individual Board members to consider specific ideas for education and outreach <br />between now and the next Board meeting; including the audience(s) to reach; how to market that <br />educational/outreach effort; and other options to consider. <br />Revised 2012 Budget/Remaining Funds (continued) <br />Discussion on remaining unencumbered funds ensued, with Mr. Petersen advising that this was the <br />GLWMO's remaining budget funds, entitled "2012 Budget," and that no further funding should be <br />anticipated from member cities. <br />6 <br />