Laserfiche WebLink
959 recruit a student from among his graduate students to conduct such a study; and opined that it shouldn't <br />960 be an in surmountable task to define a period of time to conduct a study and prioritize what the internal <br />961 loading amounted to. <br />962 <br />963 Member Miller clarified that it was not his intent to run from science either; however, he noted that the <br />964 GLWMO Board was realizing the difficulties in focusing and prioritizing their mission as it currently <br />965 stood. Member Miller opined that, should the Board decide to pursue science on this issue, it would need <br />966 to be done very carefully, and would have huge implications for recreation on Lake Owasso; in addition <br />967 to consuming the Board's time and efforts that could be better spent on issues that had already been <br />968 identified in other reports. Ultimately, if science indicates that this is still a major issue, Member Miller <br />969 noted that the Board would still be faced with reconciling if they wanted to limit motorized recreation on <br />970 Lake Owasso to any great degree. <br />971 <br />972 Member Westerberg opined that any restrictions could be limited to the one (1) month period to necessary <br />973 to conduct the study; and stated that he was not buying into the perception that the GLWMO Board's <br />974 intent was to shut down Lake Owasso for motorboat activity for an entire summer. <br />975 <br />976 Member Miller questioned if, the GLWMO Board found that this was actually a major phosphorus <br />977 source, and came to a decision point on whether or not to shut it down, the Board was prepared to take on <br />978 such a monumental task and subsequent impacts. <br />979 <br />980 Member Westerberg opined that, if the GLWMO Board was not willing to take a stand for the overall <br />981 benefit, they would have one hand tied behind their back. Member Westerberg noted that current <br />982 indications were that internal loading represented more than 50% of phosphorus loading on Lake Owasso. <br />983 <br />984 Chair Eckman questioned if adoption of the resolution precluded the Board from ever conducting the <br />985 study; advising that she was unsure if any kind of study protocol that could satisfy everyone that its <br />986 results were conclusive. Chair Eckman opined that she was concerned with the number of variables in <br />987 this type of study; and even if the study were conducted superbly, in reality it may not get approved by <br />988 the member cities. Chair Eckman noted that the study represented a lot of time, money and effort on <br />989 something that may not be viable under any circumstances. <br />990 <br />991 Member Bennett concurred with Member Westerberg on the need to know; and questioned if the existing <br />992 "No Wake Zone" could be enforced and studied more in depth. <br />993 <br />994 While recognizing that Lake Owasso was full of phosphorus, continuing to build up over the years, Chair <br />995 Eckman opined that the speed limit issue was of interest; and using it as an educational opportunity by the <br />996 Board may be more worthwhile. <br />997 <br />998 Discussion ensued regarding how the educational aspect could be pursued; potential impacts to property <br />999 values if an explosive bloom with re- suspension occurred on Lake Owasso, in addition to offensive color, <br />1000 odor and turbidity; and whether there was further modification available and less controversial way to <br />1001 study the existing "No Wake Zone" to accomplish the same thing. <br />1002 <br />1003 Member Miller questioned how a modified study could be established; noting that the Board would have <br />1004 to be very clear with a PhD candidate for any scientific study and its exact protocols. Again, Member <br />1005 Miller questioned if this was something the Board wanted to focus its attention on at this time; advising <br />1006 that he had less interest in arguing the science and more interest in understanding if this was something <br />1007 that the GLWMO Board could realistically accomplish, and it if couldn't be accomplished, it shouldn't be <br />1008 considered at this time if it took energy and focus away from other things that could realistically be <br />1009 accomplished and could provide short- and long -term benefits overall. <br />'Fill <br />