Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1. The dimensions of Lot 1 shall be reduced to 111 feet by 124.78 feet and a lot <br />size of 13,851 sq. ft. and the building pad reduced to 46 feet by 64 feet or <br />2,944 sq. ft. <br /> <br />2. The dimensions of Lot 2 shall increase to 109 feet by 114.74 feet and a lot size <br />of 12,507 sq. ft., with the proposed house footprint staying in the same <br />location and size as indicated on the variance exhibit sheet. <br /> <br />3. The access for Lot 1, Block 1 is to a County Road, it is necessary to construct a <br />turn around for this driveway. The County Traffic Engineer (Dan Soler) must <br />review this plat and driveway access and any work within the Ramsey County <br />right-of-way will require a permit. <br /> <br />4. Curb cuts must be in conformance with the City of Roseville residential driveway <br />standards. <br /> <br />5. There is sanitary and water available in Oakcrest Avenue. However, it will be <br />necessary to excavate within City right-of-way to connect the new homes to these <br />utilities. Street restoration will be necessary, consistent with the City's right-of- <br />way permit policy. <br /> <br />6. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for homes on Lots 1 - 3, a tree <br />preservation plan must be submitted and approved by the City, which plan must <br />indicate those periphery trees to be preserves and protected. <br /> <br />7. A landscape plan (for full development) must be submitted and approved, which <br />plan must include required street trees as indicated in the Roseville Street Tree <br />Master Plan for both Oakcrest Avenue and Hamline Avenue, and interior <br />landscaping. <br /> <br />8. The existing parcel is a non-platted lot. When platted into "Oakcrest Estates" it <br />will have a park dedication requirement. Since no new park expansions are <br />proposed within this planning district or an adjacent park, the applicant will be <br />required to submit a payment in lieu of land dedication amounting to $1,000 per <br />lot. <br /> <br />The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Council <br />Member Kough and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor: Mayor <br />Klausing, and Council Members Ihlan, Kough, Maschka, and Schroeder <br /> <br />and the following voted against: None <br /> <br />WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. <br /> <br />2 <br />