2011-10-20_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Comment #155 Ms. Correll opined that this comment from Mr. Roberts related to Zebra Mussels, etc. was an extreme response, and should be included in the "Emerging Issues Section" of the plan and noted that it was beyond the scope of the GLWMO, but would be addressed by other units or government. Comment #156 Ms. Correll advised that she would correct and re -word this response. Comment #237 Ms. Correll noted that this was similar to an earlier comment, and that she would remove that comment as it was more general in nature regarding monitoring for shallow lakes. Comment #242 Ms. Correll advised that this was addressed in the first response to comments document, and the commenter would be referred to that document. Comment #243 With Board concurrence, Ms. Correll suggested be revised from "water skiing — water craft activity," to "motorized watercraft." Comment #247 Ms. Correll responded to Chair Eckman's comment that the authority would depend on the purpose for establishing flood plains. Comment #249 This comment from Mr. Roberts was seeking to identify Roseville residents attending stakeholder meetings; with members identifying those there were aware of attending who may not have signed in or specific their community. Names readily available from Roseville to be added included James Stark, Mary Sorenson, Jim Kerstring and Kay Evenson (with their 18 and 21 y/o children), Skip Von De Linde, and Edward Roberts. Comment #289 Mr. Maloney, maker of this comment, opined that the response didn't address the comment related to listing lake association groups under non - regulatory entities. Chair Eckman suggested that instead of calling out those two (2) lakes identified and their neighborhood groups, since the Board continued to become aware of other lake associations previously unknown, that the Plan state informal neighborhood groups around smaller lakes primarily addressing invasive weed and algae control. Chair Eckman questioned if this would address Mr. Maloney's comment. Mr. Maloney advised that he was not necessarily anticipating a formal Board response to his comment; and that his initial concern was that inclusion of that statement seemed selective for the type of groups and their specific purpose, without clarity for the Plan reader of the GLWMO Board's rationale for including that information. Mr. Maloney noted that there were many loosely - affiliated groups in a community for whatever purpose, and attempting to include them as part of a ten (10) year Plan did not serve to help in implementing the Plan. Mr. Maloney noted that the GLWMO Board retained statutory and rule authority, and while seeking input from outside organizations or groups, the Board governed the Plan itself. 7