My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-10-20_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-10-20_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 11:31:49 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 11:30:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
10/20/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
358 <br />359 Board consensus was that, in the first paragraph, groups were identified, while not inclusive, for <br />360 the purpose of building partnerships and relationships to further encourage good stewardship of <br />361 resources to achieve the WMO's overall mission. <br />362 <br />363 Comment #301 <br />364 Ms. Correll suggested that, given budget constraints, Chair Eckman's suggestion to include this <br />365 information in the plan not be provided. <br />366 <br />367 Chair Eckman suggested that it be linked to the GLWMO Board's website, as it was not common <br />368 knowledge. <br />369 <br />370 Comment #306 <br />371 Ms. Correll explained that MnDNR had expressed concern about management responsibilities as <br />372 laid out in the Draft Plan, which were GLWMO managed, which member city managed, and <br />373 which cooperatively managed; and the entire Section 5(Management Response) had been revised <br />374 and completely rewritten; providing a circular reference, similar to responses in Comments #277, <br />375 217, and #290. <br />376 <br />377 Ms. Correll was directed to ensure references were consistent. <br />378 <br />379 Comment #390 <br />380 Ms. Correll was directed to ensure references were consistent for this comment as well. <br />381 <br />382 Comment 4315 <br />383 Ms. Correll noted that 2011 water quality data had not been evaluated, as data was only included <br />384 through 2010 when writing the Plan; and sought Board consensus to delete that form the plan. <br />385 <br />386 For transparency purposes, Chair Eckman advised that her intent was to alert Plan readers that the <br />387 trend from 2010 was not continuing into 2011; and that wetter years created worse water quality. <br />388 Chair Eckman suggested that a reminder was needed to remind readers that water quality would <br />389 change, and would not always show a linear improvement. <br />390 <br />391 Member Westerberg noted that wet seasons followed by dry seasons also had impacts; and that <br />392 dry seasons set up wet seasons for increased loading. <br />393 <br />394 While Chair Eckman indicated that would be an interesting thing to include, Ms. Correll advised <br />395 that water quality changes were addressed elsewhere in the Plan; and while many similar <br />396 comments may be interesting to readers, they may not actually be necessary in the Plan. <br />397 <br />398 Comment #321 <br />399 Regarding this comment on alum, Chair Eckman opined that it was an opportunity to educate <br />400 residents on the need to not have a lot of motorized activities on lakes in shallow areas or it would <br />401 defeat the alum treatments. <br />402 <br />403 Ms. Correll noted that this was another "cut and paste" comment; and advised development of a <br />404 treatment plan was complicated and would require guidelines for the Board's identification of <br />405 criteria. <br />406 <br />407 Ms. Correll was directed to delete Chair Eckman's proposed statement; and advised that she <br />408 would also note that lake levels were dealt with differently. <br />8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.