2011-11-17_Minutes_PH - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

306 Mr. Norton 307 Mr. Norton reiterated his comments that he didn't understand this process; that it was not interactive, and 308 didn't represent communication and didn't make any sense; and that he was unable to understand the 309 purpose of the Public Hearing to achieve some policy goal. Mr. Norton reiterated that it would be better 310 to allow a dialogue between the Board and audience to allow better understanding of the GLWMO 311 Board's rationale; and opined that the public deserved the right to know things such as how the Plan's 312 content was developed in the first place, and why it as included; and further opined that until that 313 conversation could happen, there was no way for the public to participate in the process. Mr. Norton 314 advised that it was the public's intent that things work better and be as good as they could be. 315 316 Mr. Petersen asked Mr. Norton if he had read the Plan. 317 318 Mr. Norton advised that he had not read the Plan in its entirety; but had focused on concerns about Lake 319 Owasso, while understanding that the GLWMO was much larger than just Lake Owasso, and that there 320 were more sources of problems with water quality than what was happening on the lake in a given 321 moment. Mr. Norton admitted that he had only heard of tonight's Public Hearing through a friend of a 322 friend; and had never had any direct communication from the GLWMO about any planning activities 323 going on or an invitation to participate in those conversations. 324 325 Mr. Petersen yet again reviewed the numerous meetings held over the last year seeking public comment; 326 as well as the multiple media sources available during the process to alert the public to the process in 327 updating the ten (10) year Plan, including seeking assistance from area lake associations for input and 328 disseminating meeting information to their constituency. 329 330 Mr. Norton noted that he was attending at the last minute, but stated that he was a busy guy just like 331 everyone else, and hadn't been aware of what was occurring. However, Mr. Norton stated that he was 332 here now, but was frustrated that he couldn't have the conversation he desired; however, he opined that if 333 the Plan was going to be revised and resubmitted, there should be another opportunity for additional 334 public comment. 335 336 Mr. Petersen noted that the thoughts of the GLWMO Board were clearly documented in the Plan and its 337 proposed implementation strategies and goals for the next decade; and reiterated that the purpose of 338 tonight's Public Hearing was to receive the affected public's reaction to that implementation plan. 339 340 Mr. Norton questioned if the Plan was not intended to be changed. 341 342 Mr. Petersen advised that there would be a few changes based on comment from review agencies, as well 343 as public input. 344 345 Mr. Norton suggested that his obligation appeared to go to the State and way the process was not 346 working, and to seek additional time for public comment in order to have a means to direct the outcome 347 of the Plan. Mr. Norton expressed his respect for the GLWMO Board's statutory requirements; however, 348 he stated that his confusion was related to why the GLWMO Board, as an official body, appeared to not 349 be interested in making the process work for its citizens. Mr. Norton invited the Board to try to do that; 350 or suggested that maybe citizens needed to talk to their elected officials about the process to allow 351 sufficient and beneficial input and harmonious results. 352 353 Mr. Petersen questioned what type of communication method would have been effective beyond or in 354 place of what the GLWMO Board had attempted to reach citizens. 355 7