2011-12-15_Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

253 Correll opined that she and Mr. Petersen thought the second Public Hearing could specifically address 254 those items. 255 256 Chair Eckman clarified that Ms. Correll and Mr. Petersen were recommending that the second Public 257 Hearing will include the revised plan itself and the proposed WRAPP work plan; with Ms. Correll 258 concurring with that clarification; as well as having the 2 "d Public Hearing address specific comments 259 brought up at the first Public Hearing and how those public comments to the Plan would be 260 addressed in the revised Plan. 261 262 Motion 11 -1211-4 263 Member Miller moved, and Member Westerberg seconded approval of authorizing Mr. Petersen and 264 FOR to submit the response-to- comments documentation to the state review agencies a minimum of 265 ten (10) days prior to the 2 °d Public Hearing and further authorizing Mr. Petersen to repeat the Public 266 Hearing process by declaring a Public Hearing to solicit input on the Third Generation Plan and the 267 WRAPP; with applicable legal public notice provisions being met in the local newspaperILsi as well as 268 informal calendar notices and other methods to get the word out; and declaring a Special GLWMO 269 Board meeting at the date/time of that Public Hearing; 270 271 Mr. Petersen noted that no additional revisions to the Third Generation Plan would be made until all 272 remaining issues had been resolved. 273 274 Ms. Correll advised that EOR, at that second Public Hearing, would review the Third Generation 275 Plan's outline and what the next DRAFT would entail. 276 277 Chair Eckman noted the need for FOR to specifically address the four (4) primary focus areas in the 278 revised 3`d Generation Plan as well as those that will no longer part of it. 279 Mr. Petersen noted ongoing request from GLWMO residents on how they could get a copy of the 280 plan, while the Plan had been published on the GLWMO website for at least Four (4) months. 281 282 At the request for clarification by Member Miller, Mr. Petersen advised that previously GLWMO 283 Board - approved responses -to- comments had been published on the GLWMO website; however, this 284 information should have been relayed, in hard -copy, to the various state agencies responsible for 285 reviewing the Draft Plan, with Ms. Lewis concurring as per State Statute that all responses must be in 286 writing to the State agencies and submitted at least 10 days prior to the Public Hearing. 287 288 Member Von De Linde expressed her frustration that so many GLWMO residents remained unaware 289 of these meetings; and her desire for more support to allow those residents to know what was 290 happening. 291 292 Member Miller opined that it was human nature that no matter the extent of notices provided, 293 someone would still claim they were not notified in a timely or sufficient manner. 294 295 Ms. Lewis opined that, if the GLWMO Board retained a copy of those people submitting comments, 296 the Board use their e-mail or mail contacts to alert them to meeting announcements. Ms. Lewis 297 advised that she still had difficulty receiving copies of meeting notices from the GLWMO Board, 298 even though she continued to request those notices. 299 300 Member Von De Linde opined that asking people to access information from the GLWMO website 301 was asking too much; and there should be other avenues to pursue to keep them advised. 302 6