My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0523
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0523
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:26:20 AM
Creation date
6/30/2005 4:23:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/23/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Proposed Amendment for Dangerous Animals Ordinance -- #3 <br />Amy Ihlan <br /> <br />I move to delete 501. 16(A)(2) (definition of "potentially dangerous animal") and <br />50 1.16(C) (registration of "potentially dangerous animals") and to remoye all other <br />references to "potentially dangerous animals" from the ordinance. <br /> <br />All animals are currently required to be restrained, licensed, and vaccinated under our <br />existing ordinances. The proposed new provisions for "declaration and registration of <br />potentially dangerous animals" do not add anything to these requirements, other than the <br />possibility of requiring obedience classes. <br /> <br />I think the city should focus the attention of this Ordinance on controlling dangerous <br />animals, and continue to enforce existing leash, license and vaccination laws for all other <br />animals. If, after some experience, this scheme turns out to be inadequate, the Council <br />could reconsider the "potentially dangerous" classification or other kinds of regulations <br />as appropriate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.