1978_0213_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

CASE NUM�ER: 1090-78 February I, I91$ Page Two The buzlding is set back to be in lin� with the building nroposed to the ea�t. �. Both office buildings proposed will be af brick cons�tructian utilizing the same brick for both buildings. This brick color is called "medium tor�e ming1e" an� can be seen an an o#'fice buildinn owned by the applicant at County Road C and New Highway 8. ��lood �rim on tF�e bui�din� wili be a dark stain�d cedar tv match LaBe11e's. The glass will be solar bronze with frames in "anociized bronze a�uminum". The f�ashing on all the huildings will be dark brown. The inteni is to relate the two buildings through the use of bui1ding materials, t�ough the architects on each building will of course, be di�Fferent. The architects have prepared exterior elevations of the building which will be �resenied at large scale at the Planning Comrr►ission hearing_ 6. The division as prapo5ed leaves a parcel to the wesi consisting of 2.2 acres. 41e are infarmed by the app�icants that there are several pro�pects for the use of this land for office purposes, and it is anticipateci that the land will be developed in ihe relatively near future. �. Site plan approval is not required in the B-1 Disirict, al�hough in this case the applicants }�ave prepared complete site plans for both the buildin9s as a demonstration of the validity of the proposea lot divisian. The coordination of the design of the two buildings, and their very large setbacks fram County Ro�d B, 4re feel are co�sidera�le assets in the development of this property. The developjnent of the common access road between the two properties(as origina�ly planned) is also an asset in aliowing internal circula�ion withjn this black, without diverting traffic to 'the public s-treet system to move from one site to the other.