My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1976_0809_CC_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1976
>
1976_0809_CC_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 4:24:13 PM
Creation date
2/21/2012 4:30:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
125
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�• CASE �fUt�I6ER: 999-76 <br />August 4, 1976 <br />Page Twa <br />5. The appiicant notes that �he add�tiona� 30 feet is required to <br />maintain the ievei of parking accommodation req�ired in the iease <br />agreement. Required parking 7n t�e 7ease agreements is 3,010 spaces. <br />The totai parking accom�nodated on tf�e site including that for a <br />clinic use wo�ald be 3,15Q. 7ota1 parking requirements as prescribed <br />by ordi nance i s as -�ol 1 oYrs : <br />Shopping Center, 379,553 GLA <br />Ground Round, 245 sea�s <br />Medical Clinic, 42,000 sq. ft. <br />a� five spaca_s per ].,0�0 <br />7ora�. <br />2,619 spaces <br />82 spaces <br />2? 0 st�aces <br />2,911 spaces <br />6. �t is no-teworth that Har Mar, inc. currently owns five of the 2l, houses <br />in the residential area westerly of -�he property in qu�s�ion (east of <br />5nelling Aven�ae and north of Ryan Avenue). hlar-ie Slawik te71s us <br />she intends to�can-�inue to purc�ase houses in tt�is area even though <br />some of the prices asked are over �3.00,000. <br />7. 5everal p�rsons have ca7led from the neighborhood to the east <br />regarding the ciinic proposal. LJ�en it was explained where �he <br />buildina would be located (in the center) and t�at the exis�ing 40 <br />foot b�ffer on the east side of the Shopping Center would remain� <br />intac�, they �nd�cated their support far the proposal. <br />8. Tn summary, it wouid appear that the propased development �For <br />por�ions of the virtually unneeded park3ng area i�a this tract is <br />reasonab7 e and desi rabl e. E1 errati ons for the propased cl i ni c <br />structure would indicaie th�s to be a very handsome building. The <br />use „of course, �involves an absolute minimum of night-time ac�ivity <br />and provides a use-Ful essentiai service convenient to c��izens in <br />t�e area . <br />. <br />.� <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.