Laserfiche WebLink
Case Pau�riber: 994-7f <br />�uly' � , -1976 <br />� Rag� Tvro �;,�..: s:��,: <br />... �,.;►..._.�,.�,�:-.r :.: �:��.;.,�tand.a stiv�mming_ pQol._.:The:;bui�ding is par�za�ly..subm�;r.ged: ir� �: , .. ��:,:����, <br />the ground to reduce its exterior height. �he exterior ' <br />materials are brick, siucco, and an insultated sandwich paneZ <br />to be �?scri bed � n grea�ar d4'�a i 1 a ��.'r:2 h�ari n g. The R�cq�,�2 � <br />Club use of por�ions af the si�e is contiguous to �he residential <br />o� �he narth and th� east sidz of the �uilding. No parfcing <br />is located betti�een the club structure and resider�tia1 ar�as <br />to the north or the east. <br />m <br />�VZ��;111C Sut��J _ CD:�:.1 �L:�US :.� Li:� �� rti i� %'(T t+,i��i S�'i�j l. C�. n� S�t:��i <br />side of �he 'L"-shaped �uild;ng, ther� will be 21,1°3 square f�e� <br />of. gross 1z�sable ar�a for s��:�11 sp��-ialiy sr��ps_ Por�io;is af <br />the building have a sloped shingle roo�' forming a canopy aver the <br />shop fruntage. An interior mal7 conriects al7 t�� shaps and are <br />accessi bl e from '�he cl ub bui 1 di ng as tivel 1. The ei evat� ans o� the <br />structure appear very attractive. f�one of the shop spac� or <br />frontage can be seen direc�ly �rom the nar�h ar eas�i sid� of <br />the 6uilding. � <br />R�SiAiJRA�dT_ Qn the wes�erly side of the site, the applicant� <br />q praposes to cans�truct a restauran� of ap�roxinately 24,00� g�^oss <br />square feei. 7his restaurant is proposed to be a"fu�� servi�e" <br />fac�lity urith 35� seats. The Lincoln Del is be�ng pursued for <br />this location, ihough no sp�ci►ic commi�tment has �e�n finalized <br />to th7s poin�. 7hat structure i5 located l23 fee� sou�h of �he <br />north 1ine of the prop�rty.. _ <br />5. T�e racqu�t and s�rrim c7ub is a special use in the R-1 �istrict tvith �he <br />provision that it mus� be at ieast 5� fee� from the properiy 7ine. 7he <br />applicant is applying far suc� a specia�t us.e permii on tF�e condi��ct� <br />that i� be set back 100 �Feet from #�e ti�resterly prop4rty 1 i ne (vrest s� de <br />af �ry Street). Tf�e Ci�y could ask far �he dzd�cation flf 30 fe�t or <br />rig��-o�--way �o zncrease the width of Fry 5�reet_� Lde unders�and that <br />that neighbors are not interested in widen�ng Fry Street du� to its very <br />1 i mi ted �raf-�� c vol ume ta date. Thz appi i can� i s�vi 1 i i ng , hov�iev2r, to <br />dedi cate ( or pro�i de publ i c easer^en�} �o tti�ro t�nni s courts e�rhi ch he woul d <br />cons�ruct on thi s si de of the �u i 1 di r►g for� ti�e use of �h� n�i ghbors or <br />the City. The remainder o-� this land on the east side of �he buiiding <br />would be u�� 1 i zed for i n�erim pon�i ng purposes as part o� ti�2 �+lat�rshed <br />pistr�ct's 100 year ��ood control plan. A71 the land eiccept the tennis <br />courts, hoti�r�ver, tivould of course �e grassed and landscaped zn accardance <br />tivi th �hei r pr�oposed pl an . <br />b. Tt�ough some of the 1�2ig'nbors fear ihe influx o-� peoele and cars i-F <br />tenn�s courts are built in this arz3, �rie ttav� s+�ggested to tf�em that <br />tennis cou�t fac�li-�ies controlle� by the neighbarhodd associaGiaz� <br />could be a very attract�ve �ea�ure to homzo:•;n2rship in �ha� area. Current <br />interest and demand for tennis courts, ti�rould suyges� that the City and/ <br />or �hA �e�ghbor'rtood seriously cansider �he merits of -ih�s con�ribu�ion <br />on the par� of the applicant. <br />