1976_1108_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Nove�ber 3, �976 PLA�NING REPORT CASE N�MBER: APPLICANT: LQCAT I0�! : AC7ION REQU�STEO: PLANNIiVG CONSIDERATIQNS: 1. You will plaiting sac and property 102i-76 J. M. Duddleston Northwest af Socath Owasso Bou�evard North of Owasso Shores Addition (See Skeich) Approval of Preliminary_ Plat recali some months ago, Mr. Duddleston had revised tf�� j ,. � � �;� -�-� - _ ., . of his property on Lake Owasso, �Ziminat�ng a public cul-de- substituting a driveway access to the laEceshore 7ots. His at that �irr� had 3.91 feet of frontage or� Lake Owasso. 2. Mr. Duddleston has since purchased an additiona� 180 f�et of frontage an l.ake Owasso to the east of his groperty, and propases now to plat the property 5o as to accommodate a total af six building sites on.the Zand. The sketch at the 7eft indicates the arrangement of the ]ots_ The 7ot sizes exc7usive of the driveway access port3on�of �he lots is as fa�lows: Lot 1 = 25,500 L ot 2= 17 , 603 Lat 3 = I9,4b0 Lot 4 = 17,276 l.o� 5 = 15,750 Lot 6 = 15,887 s�uare feet square �eet square feet square feet square feefi square feet 3. 41e and memb�rs of the Public Wor[cs nepartment have reviewed this propflsal extensively with ��Ir� Duddleston over �he past few months, attempting ta achieve the most appropriate lot lines to provide the best build3ng site conditions. In this case, it a�ould appear that providing acc�ss to the lalceshore �ots via the private driveway method (versus a public street and eul--de-sac} �s the best way �o handle this unique property. It wi11 be possible, of caurse, to construc� a cul--de-sac in the land. However, we �eel such a me-�hod on this property wou�d substantially destray any of ihe property'S unique topographieal and tree growtli assets. Normaliy, a lr�ng pr�vaie driveway to lots ane behind the other is not recommended due fo the expense �f the �ong utility lin�s and maintenance of the driveway itself. Tn this case, however, where the homes to be construc�ed an the lakeshor�e 7ots (Lots 1, 2, and 3) wil� obviausly be of substantial qual�ty where-in the owners of such 1 ots car� easi ly afford ihe additi onal �urden of mai niai ni ng tf�e uti 1 i�y 1 i r�es and stree�ts themsel ves . The asset ta the City is thai we do not �ave to maintain a cul-de-sac which would be the o�Cher method of developing t�e 7and. _., : . . ;-_.