My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2012 1:53:58 PM
Creation date
2/24/2012 1:53:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/23/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 23, 2012 <br /> Page 11 <br /> making for local government simply thinking of the bottom lien for its citizens. <br /> Rep. Greiling advised that the MPCA, LMC and other agencies were supportive <br /> of organized trash collection, and Conservation Minnesota's support was pending. <br /> Rep. Greilng asked that the City look at the upcoming legislation, which she had <br /> co-authored, with Sen. Marty carrying the bill in the Senate, opining that it was a <br /> process worthy of the Roseville community and was based on accurate infor- <br /> mation, not misinformation. <br /> Sen. Marty expressed his pleasure in attending tonight's meeting, and his pleasure <br /> in working with Rep's. Scalze and Greiling. Sen. Marty briefly addressed the cur- <br /> rent budget forecasts that were better than previously anticipated, and the number <br /> of constitutional amendments that were hot issues. Beyond that, Sen. Marty ad- <br /> vised that he was not anticipating anything major, but that some session business <br /> always remained an unknown. <br /> Mayor Roe addressed two items of interest to the City of Roseville: legislation in- <br /> troduced regarding the local option sales tax and the ability of cities to enact the <br /> tax for specific purposes; and encouraged legislative support of those efforts, not- <br /> ing the unique situation of Roseville and its significant retail environment. Mayor <br /> Roe also addressed the City's interest in the market value homestead credit being <br /> not reinstated, unless with dedicated funding that would not disappear or that <br /> would successfully work for cities,unlike the old system that never was feasible. <br /> Even though the City had no bonding projects this year, City Manager Malinen <br /> offered staff's assistance as a resource to the legislative delegation at their discre- <br /> tion. <br /> Councilmember McGehee questioned the potential for the City of Roseville to get <br /> funding included in the Bonding bill for freeway overpasses to allow safe pedes- <br /> trian and bicycle traffic. <br /> Rep. Scalze advised that the current bonding bill had been pared down from $2 <br /> billion in requests, with the Governor supporting his version of the bill, and the <br /> legislative majority looking at even less funding. Rep. Scalze advised that any <br /> such project as mentioned by Councilmember McGehee would be a long-term <br /> project to get it into the works and fit it with other interested projects, noting that <br /> the Rice Street bridge project was four years in the making; and many taking up <br /> to ten years to find their way into a bonding bill if at all. <br /> Councilmember McGehee further questioned a rail line along Highway 36; with <br /> Rep. Scalze advising that there was a long-term fight to get funding for the Cen- <br /> tral Corridor Rail Line. Rep. Scalze advised that the northeast suburbs didn't ask <br /> for things often enough to initiate significant interest, with state dollars going to <br /> those suburban cities in the southwest who ask for things. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.