My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/24/2012 1:53:58 PM
Creation date
2/24/2012 1:53:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/23/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 23,2012 <br /> Page 19 <br /> Mayor Roe noted that, while all storm water fee payers in Roseville currently <br /> supported the GLWMO across the City and this may change that situation, the <br /> mechanism to do so becomes the issue. However, he noted that it became a big- <br /> ger issue if the City Council approved the proposed budget and funding and the <br /> member cities' ability to meet the requirements set out in this organization,. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that those discussions had been brought forward in our previous <br /> discussions and impacts to residents of Roseville or specifically just in this WMO. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that the way the system was set up for water management dis- <br /> tricts and organizations made sense and while there were concerns about losing <br /> local control,he was not as concerned about that potential. <br /> Councilmember McGehee expressed her favorable impression with the Third <br /> Generation Plan developed by the GLWMO; however, she opined that the financ- <br /> ing was not realistic in making the Plan work, and that for the preservation of the <br /> watershed, there needed to be a larger oversight and control organization. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee noted that this was a huge drainage area; and this action was <br /> not based on any failure on the part of the GLWMO Board or their proposed <br /> goals, but purely an effort to have a larger organization with taxing authority to <br /> implement the goals of the watershed. <br /> Mayor Roe thanked the GLWMO Board for their work. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Pust; Wilimus; Johnson; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> e. Adopt Ordinance Amending Title Seven, Section 703.04, to Exempt Publicly <br /> Owned and Operated Public Safety Facilities from Driveway Width Maxi- <br /> mum Regulations <br /> City Manager Malinen briefly summarized this request as detailed in the RCA <br /> dated January 23, 2012. Mr. Malinen noted that this became an apparent revision <br /> as the plans for the new fire station were being designed. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Wilimus, Fire Chief Tim O'Neill advised that <br /> all three (3) current fire stations exceeded the 36' curb cut and was recommended <br /> due to Code 3 responses from those stations. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Willmus, Chief O'Neill advised that the City <br /> was currently working with Ramsey County on revising their maximum of 55' for <br /> a curb cut, advising that they were willing to make adjustments since this was a <br /> public safety facility. <br /> Councilmember Willmus referenced an issue raised by a citizen as to how a pub- <br /> lic safety facility was defined. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.