Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,January 23, 2012 <br /> Page 22 <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Mr. Miller confirmed that such an operation would <br /> need to be licensed by the City. <br /> Pust moved, Willmus seconded, directing staff to work with the City Attorney's <br /> office to develop language banning any of these types of establishments for sam- <br /> pling in the City of Roseville, and that this language be brought forward post <br /> haste to have an ordinance in place before any applications came forward for con- <br /> sideration. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Pust; Willmus; Johnson; McGehee; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> b. Consider Adopting Financial Policies as Ordinances <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, Councilmember McGehee noted that, since she had <br /> originally brought forth this request, she had come to the conclusion that the same <br /> majority vote rules would apply, therefore negating her preference to revise these <br /> policies into ordinances. Councilmember McGehee noted that her original re- <br /> quest was made in light of the recent Council majority vote to override their <br /> standing policy regarding voter referendums and use their Port Authority to issue <br /> bonds. However, at this time, Councilmember McGehee suggested leaving the <br /> policies as they are; but she personally encouraged the City Council to follow <br /> their own policies. <br /> Mayor Roe recognized Councilmember McGehee's point; and clarified that a 3 <br /> vote majority was required for ordinance enactment, a policy or resolution could <br /> be adopted on a 2/1 vote if a full City Council was not in place at that time. <br /> Councilmember Pust advised that she didn't quite agree that changing an ordi- <br /> nance was as easy as changing a policy, since there were different notice and pub- <br /> lic hearing requirements before such action. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that the City Council had adopted an ordinance earlier this <br /> evening, without a prior public hearing. <br /> City Attorney Bartholdi advised that enactment of an ordinance did not necessari- <br /> ly require a public hearing, but needed to be deliberated and voted upon by the <br /> City Council, with no separate notice requirements, other than publication of it af- <br /> ter enactment. <br /> c. Discuss Funding Change for Engineer Position in Public Works <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz summarized this request as detailed in the RCA <br /> dated January 23, 2012, and staff recommendations regarding funding for an En- <br /> gineer position in Public Works, previously a shared position with the City of Ar- <br /> den Hills under provisions of a JPA. <br />