Laserfiche WebLink
NiEET1NG 2�g�7b <br />I��C�L���� ��f� \s��Y���� �����i"� DATE: <br />AGENpA SECTION: 4RIGINATING bEP7./DIV.: <br />���?Q-i'�S 3T1C� �eCOP1P,42iLLa'�IOiLS Ac�inis�ration <br />DEPT. H�AD APPROVAL_ <br />\� <br />�I NO.: 1TEM DESCRIPTION� Chanaler-��Tilbert Vau1t Campany request for MGft. REVIEW�D/RECOMMEN�S: <br />vax�ance to sic�eyard setback at 2280 T1. Harnl�ne and v�rzance <br />�v�" to izse a rnad�aalr xt "L270 N_ Ha�'Iin� fnr inri���firial rn�rnnsac <br />'l�he P�c1ILT1171� C�T�lIlL15S1G� a.t its February 4 meeti.ng unanimously recammerzded <br />appr.aval ot Charidler-�'�ilbert Vau1t Campany`s request for a variance reducizzg <br />the ree{uired setbaCk for paxk�ng from 4fl fee� to zero feet and reducing the <br />required building setback �rom 60 feet �o ze�o feet at 2280 ?varth Ha�nline <br />and a variarzce allowing a driveway on the R-1 �ro�exty at 2270 ?�lorth Haml�ne <br />to serve �he I-1 property a� 228U North Har�line with the fallowing conditions: <br />1) Tha.t �he conti�xoLts sxn�l.e family lot at Z27Q North Hamline <br />being 75 feet in �7idth, be purchased and main�ained as an <br />integral part of the pxoperty iocated a� 2Z$0 North F,amline. <br />2) That a driveway ta serve as a connecting Iink fram the <br />front of the R-� 1ot to the storage areas in the rear of <br />-t.he I-1 Io� be aZlowed to a maximum �vidth of 24 .feet. <br />3) That said driveway be located on the north half of the R-1 <br />property. <br />4) That thE existin.g grade he maintained on the southexly half <br />of the R-1 lot and the exzstin.g tree growth be �ai.ntained in <br />said area. <br />5) That the existing re�aining wall on the east sicle of �he I-�. <br />property be extencled a�. its existing hei_ght to a d.istan�e 25 <br />feet from the south line of the contiguaus R-1 property to be <br />da�e at such time as the variance is exerci.sed. <br />And further recommended tha� the 6 mon.th variance time limitatian be extended <br />to S years fox the variances. <br />The City Code provides that unless construction is started tivithzn 6 months after <br />the grantino af a var�.ance, that the variance wi21 expire. Since the Chand.ler- <br />VJilbert Company does not know at thzs tzme when their expansion will occur, <br />they xec{uested that �he 6 month period be extended to S years. <br />A�tached is the Planner's report. <br />COiJ1�1CIL ACTION RI?QUESTF.D: <br />?��ot�on (approving) (denying) (con'�inuing) Ghandler-tidilbert Vau�.� Company's <br />request for varian�e -reducing rec�u�red sethack for parkin� fram 40 feet ta zero <br />feet ana reducing the xet{uired building setback from 6Q _feet to zero feet at <br />2280 A?orth IIasnline and also a variance allowing a driveway an the R-I pro�exty <br />a.t 227Q North Haml�ne ta serve ihe I--� property a� Z280 Pdarth Hamline (-the Councxl <br />may desire to a�tach the condit�.ons as recammended by the Planning Co�nission and <br />alsa apprave the extention of the 6 month variance �il[!e limitation to 5.years <br />for the variance}. <br />