My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 9:44:01 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 9:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2012
Meeting Type
Special
Keywords
Special Strategic Planning Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2012 <br /> Page 14 <br /> Councilmember Willmus noted the overwhelming support around the table for the <br /> Parks renewal program and the Parks Master Plan, as well as continuation of the <br /> CIP Program; however, he noted the need for the City to be more vocal in lobby- <br />, ing transportation efforts in the NE metro area,to avoid being overlooked. <br /> In addressing Mr. Miller's comments regarding businesses, Councilmember <br /> Willmus suggested that be parlayed into a Finance Commission to look at long- <br /> range financial planning for the City, perhaps even encompassing an economic <br /> development component and utilizing business leaders in the community to help <br /> focus and maximize the City's tax base. <br /> Councilmember Willmus also addressed his goal to establish a Park Board, mod- <br /> eled after the City's HRA and having more direct control over their budget and <br /> funding, and providing greater clarity to the public of where their dollars were be- <br /> ing spent. <br /> Councilmember Willmus spoke in support of continuing to re-evaluate staffing <br /> levels and job duties, with some departments already having done so, and wishing <br /> to see that same process on the communications and administrative portions of the <br /> City. While noting that there had been considerable discussion tonight on percep- <br /> tion, and the survey information indicated that the City was doing things very <br /> well, Councilmember Willmus noted that in paring that down, there remained is- <br /> sues related to communications and marketing between the City and the public <br /> that needed to be addressed, and more transparency for residents to know where <br /> their tax dollars were going. <br /> c. Mayor Roe (Attachment Item 9.e, dated January 30,2012) <br /> Mayor Roe asked for Parks Director Brokke to address short- and long-term goals <br /> for volunteer management in his written comments and questioned him not in- <br /> cluding that as a highlighted goal in his verbal comments, given the high and po- <br /> tential impact to those goals. <br /> Mr. Brokke advised that this was a carry-over from last year's goals, but would <br /> require an additional staff person to coordinate those volunteers. While having <br /> volunteer coordinators in the past, Mr. Brokke noted that it was difficult to retain <br /> them, and the role needed to coordinate a variety of tasks consistently. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that this was an area of concern — retaining volunteers across <br /> the community — in a number of capacities, not just Parks and Recreation; and <br /> opined that it should remain under discussion. Mayor Roe confirming that Mr. <br /> Brokke didn't eliminate it from his highlights because he didn't think it was im- <br /> portant. <br /> Mayor Roe reviewed his goals, based on his written submission and from the <br /> lenses outlined by Councilmember Pust: Control: Impact: and Resources. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.