My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 9:44:01 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 9:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2012
Meeting Type
Special
Keywords
Special Strategic Planning Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2012 <br /> Page 18 <br /> Local Government Management, Economic health, Stable Property Taxes (Survey <br /> Results of those items needing more attention) <br /> Councilmember Pust questioned if everyone at the table agreed or didn't agree with those <br /> survey results, and whether those items needed more work in the community. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that, while not the only gauge, all input from the community should <br /> be considered from all sources, including general interaction with the public or any other <br /> civic engagement participation opportunities. <br /> Councilmember Willmus opined that he did not have 100% faith in the validity of the <br /> survey and it accurately representing the community. However, he further opined that <br /> the responses may also be indicative of the type of questions asked. Councilmember <br /> Willmus suggested future surveys providing more detail, such as that used by the City of <br /> Shoreview. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with Councilmember Willmus, and moving forward <br /> expressed her preference to use a model similar to that used by Shoreview and compared <br /> with other metropolitan communities, with follow-up every three (3) years to measure <br /> outcomes. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe, City Manager Malinen advised that the cost of the Decision <br /> Resources firm for a survey was $25,000 compared with $10,000 for Cobalt. Mayor Roe <br /> noted that the decision was made on a cost basis, whether it reflected the community as a <br /> whole or not. <br /> Councilmember Johnson opined that he found the government portion of the survey irrel- <br /> evant, since in his personal conversations with citizens he had never heard someone ex- <br /> press their concern with the status of City investments or assets, specific funds or how <br /> they were doing. However, Councilmember Johnson concurred with the communications <br /> portion of the survey results, encouraging the best communication with customers as hu- <br /> manly possible. <br /> Mayor Roe requested that City Manager Malinen provide Councilmembers and staff with <br /> a breakdown of the local government portion of the survey for further review and specific <br /> feedback. <br /> Councilmember Pust questioned if there were any comments on the economic health or <br /> tax stability portions of the survey,with no one responding. <br /> Outcomes... <br /> Councilmember Pust referenced Mayor Roe's January 28, 2012 e-mail and DRAFT <br /> "Outcome" summary, emphasizing its draft form; and for the public's benefit, read those <br /> community aspirations as drafted by Mayor Roe (Item 4), and references and links identi- <br /> fied by summarized by Councilmember McGehee in her e-mail to City Manager Malinen <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.