My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/27/2012 9:44:01 AM
Creation date
2/27/2012 9:42:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2012
Meeting Type
Special
Keywords
Special Strategic Planning Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2012 <br /> Page 19 <br /> dated January 26, 2012 (Item 9.d). Councilmember Pust sought any additional items to <br /> include or any items to be removed from individuals around the table. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested "economic health" and "stability of property taxes" be <br /> added to the list from the survey,but not"local government management." <br /> Discussion included, whether "tax stability" fell under "economic health," or was a <br /> community aspiration; whether to include it with the list of"responsible economic en- <br /> deavors under the last aspiration; relationship to the community in general and how best <br /> to connect it; assuming opportunities or ways to finance goals as an aspiration to be en- <br /> gaged; and how to best market it to encourage and facilitate, as a City Council and City <br /> government, implementation and methods to allow those things to happen. <br /> It was the consensus to add this as a separate aspiration: <br /> "Economically Healthy with a Stable Tax Base." <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that, with some minor tweaking, this DRAFT document <br /> prepared by Mayor Roe could become an accurate reflection of what had been learned <br /> from the community and what the City Council wanted to accomplish, as culminating <br /> from a variety of sources. With consensus of the group, Councilmember Pust volun- <br /> teered to tweaking the document based on tonight's discussion and meeting notes, to be <br /> re-presented in modified format in the near future to facilitate further discussion or ap- <br /> proval. By doing so, Councilmember Pust noted that this would allow something for in- <br /> dividual reactions and make more efficient use of everyone's time. <br /> By consensus, this process was approved. <br /> Process and Substance <br /> As the next step following those revisions, Councilmember Pust advised that she would <br /> submit those revisions to individuals through City Manager Malinen seeking their com- <br /> ments or items inadvertently missed; allowing a good final document. <br /> Councilmember Pust suggested that the group didn't meet next week, but allow sufficient <br /> time at their February 13, 2012 meeting, based on the estimated agenda time available <br /> from City Manager Malinen; with Councilmembers holding themselves accountable to <br /> accomplish the tasks at hand and commit to finishing the document. <br /> Discussion ensued on future meeting agendas; preference to accomplish the task sooner <br /> rather than later; the obvious lack of controversy in discussions while having realistic <br /> goals to ensure them coming to fruition; and seeking input from staff on the reality of <br /> staff's available hours and staffing resources based on those aspirations. <br /> At the request of Mayor Roe regarding the actual work plan, Councilmember Pust opined <br /> that it would flow from this initial list, once prioritized, and once money, human re- <br /> sources and capacity for control were addressed within that list. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.