1975_1117_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

.• � ( � October 1, 1975 PLANNING REPORi CASE NUMBER: APPLICANi: LOCATI�N: ACTIO� REQUESTED: PLANNING CONSIDERATIO�VS: 926-75 Ray Kroiss East of Cieveland Avenue, South of Wi�der Street (see sketch) Appra�al af Pr�l�minary Plat and Rezoning from R-3A to R-Z .� i. You will recall that Mr. Kroiss recently platted the property immediat��y north of�the property in quest�on into nine sing�e family 7ots (White Oak Nills). At t�at izme t�e remaining property to the sou#,h (the proper�y �n quest-ian) was appl�ed for rezoning from R-3A {multiple -Family) to I-1 {ligh� industrial}. This request was turned down by the City due principally to the patential encroachment of industrial zon�ng on �his and contig�ous properties, and prob�er�s of access to fu��are contig�ous properties. 2. At this time P�Ir. Kroiss proposes to develop the subject praperty �vith duplexes rather than as apartments as currenily zoned. For this purpose, the applicant has filed a preliminary plat which consists o�F tweive (12} lots fronting on Qroposed Srenner Aver�ue as shown on the sketch at the Ieft.� ihe applicarst would have preferred to develop the property w�th "a simp�e cul--de-sac, but has agreed ta extend the s�reet to the eas�er�y pro�erty line so as to provide future aecess �io the property to the east as suggested by the C3ty s�aff. 3. You will not� on th whicn wauld offer a east to the subjeci circulation system to County Road D. e sketch ihe projectiot� ot a street in dotted iines means of tying the residential properties �a the prop�rty zn a manner which provides and ef-F�cient for residential development from C�eveland Avenue 4. Yau wi�l note tvo, that there are iwo lor�g narrow pieces of praper-�y immedia�ie�y east of the property in question, each with a wicf-�h af 275 feet (fronta�e on County Ro�d D). A contract purchaser of the easterl� property of these two has indicated a desire to develap the land for single �amily purposes. The street as shown on the slcetch in the dotted lines �rrould accomplish this tying in to the property in ques�ion {Brenner Avenue). tJe have also reviewed th�s proposal with the owner of �he westerly property through which Brenner would pass near the south end. 1Je t�ave �ndicated to these o►vnars (the Schulze Fami�y) the manner in vrhich this praposed extension of residential streets would open up �heir property for single -Family development at such time as they prapose to do so. bde have sugnested that represen�ati�es of the Schulze family be at the P�ann�ng Commiss�on meeting to express their v�ews on this proposa�.