Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />o' <br />Case Number: � -75 � <br />Octaber 1, 1975 Rage Two <br />5. We suggest that t�he deve� opment of the ci rcul ati on patterr� as <br />proposed in the plai in quesiion and the extension�to �he east and <br />north to County Road D will provide a means of -fu7filling the single <br />family developmen� po�ential in thi5 area, yet keeping the circu�ation <br />separate from the area to the south. The Compr�hensi�e Plan of 1969 <br />sugges�s the area �o the south as far as the alignmer�t for �ydia Avenue <br />�o be for multipie purposes. Beyond that the plan suggests indus�rial <br />development . <br />6. In view of the relationship to the single family area to the east, i� <br />wili appear the development of �he land for d�Qlex p�rpases with 8renner <br />A�enue as proposed cons�itutes and improvemeni over the exi,st�ny zoning <br />for apartment development. The development of the land for apartment <br />purposes would r�ot require the extens�on of the street thereby negatir�g <br />the develapment af the circujation pattern described �n ihis report. <br />� <br />� <br />