My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2012 12:40:45 PM
Creation date
2/29/2012 12:40:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 13, 2012 <br /> Page 17 <br /> Discussion items included economic development (lines 67 and 72) and status of <br /> that particular strategy based on Community Development Department-specific <br /> strategies, and near future development of costs and staffing requirements to <br /> achieve outlined strategies and a timeframe for doing so; if and how to allocate <br /> resources for short- and long-term opportunities and options; and which options <br /> staff thought provided the most impact, while identifying areas from which to al- <br /> locate funds to achieve those strategies and goals. <br /> Mayor Roe referenced the existing work plan, lines 60-63. <br /> City Manager Malinen referenced line 68, and page 8 of the existing work plan <br /> (line 166 and line 188) and questioned if this was specific to housing and redevel- <br /> opment or related to under-utilized and high-crime areas. <br /> Mayor Roe opined that he read it as both commercial and residential. <br /> Finance Director Miller noted that this was one of his strategies, and his intent <br /> was that it be broad and not specific to housing; but with the intent to create in- <br /> centives to work on community-wide economic development for all under- <br /> utilized properties. <br /> At the request of Councilmember Pust as to what types of incentives, Mr. Miller <br /> advised that the financial aspect was part of it, not just local funding; however, he <br /> suggested the need to look at the overall picture of all things that allowed the <br /> problem to continue. In his ten years with the City of Roseville, Mr. Miller noted <br /> that some of the problems at the beginning of his tenure were still evident, and <br /> while the problems were recognized, but not resolved with the existing tools; and <br /> questioned as a citizen when the City should or could get involved and eradicate a <br /> specific problem. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that this was also related to the tax base as well and problem <br /> properties negatively impacting property values beyond a particular parcel. <br /> Councilmember McGehee referenced Brooklyn Park as an example of proactive <br /> solutions. <br /> Mr. Miller noted that the Brooklyn Park example was one option to take more di- <br /> rect control of properties; however, he cautioned that it was not viable in all situa- <br /> tions. <br /> Mayor Roe noted that it would require the City investing in and taking advantage <br /> of some tools not currently being used and would require identification of re- <br /> sources. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.