Laserfiche WebLink
e <br />ExTRAGT OF MTNUTES OF MEETING QF THE CITY EOU:�CIL <br />OF ROSEVILLE, MII�N�SQTA - HELD March 31, ].975 <br />* * � � :� � � � * * * � � � � * � � � � �r * * * * <br />Pursuant to due call and notice thexeof, a regulax meeting <br />o£ the City Council of Rosevii7.e, Minnesota was duly held 'at the <br />C�.ty Hai.l in said City on Monday, March 31, 1975, at 7:3Q P.M. <br />The £ollowing members were present: <br />and the foilowing were absent; <br />Cotxnciiman intraduced and moved the adoption <br />of the following resolution: <br />RE50LUTION N0. <br />WHEREAS, the City of RosevilZe supparts the intent of <br />the open meeting law which is to have the pubiic business conducteci <br />ogeniy so that thepublic can be inforrned of the decisions and actians <br />being taken, and <br />WHEREAS, nevertheless there are certain matters of a con�id- <br />ential nature which may not be in the. public interest at a particular <br />time to disclose publ.icly, and <br />Wf�REAS, the Attorney General has rendered an opinian which <br />appears �o be moxe xestrictive than the leg�slature intended. <br />NaW, TI-�EREFORE, BE IT it�SdLVBD that the City Council of <br />the City of Roseville respec�£u11y urge the Mannesota State Legzslature <br />to consider changes to the open meetz.ng law which would provide for <br />amendments to the law as praposed in the draft lega�slation submitted <br />by the League of Minnesota Municipalities, and <br />BE IT �URTHER RESOLVED that copies of this resalution be <br />transmitted to the Governor of the Sta�e of Mznnesata,.Roseville's <br />legislative representa�ives and the League of Minnesata Municipalities. <br />�he motion for the adaption of the foregoing resolution was <br />duly seconc�ed by Member and upon vote beYng taken thereon, <br />the fnllowing voted in favar: <br />and tYze following voted against: <br />WHEREUPDN, said xesolution was declared duly passed and <br />adapted. <br />