My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0126
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0126
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:26:58 AM
Creation date
7/13/2005 3:53:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/26/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting - 01/26/04 <br />Page 22 <br /> <br />resulting in a tie vote, at that point the process as per Statute was <br />initiated, and Mayor Klausing would be required to make the <br />appointment. Mr. Anderson therefore encouraged substantial <br />discussion prior to any vote on any candidate. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing reiterated his preference for discussion prior to <br />any motions being brought forward. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified that, as long as Mayor Klausing <br />made the appointment in the event of a tie vote, the Mayor was <br />permitted any advice available; but the word "shall" in the <br />Statute was mandatory. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing opened the discussion to public comment, with <br />no one appeanng. <br /> <br />Council discussion ensued in the process, with Councilmember <br />Kough noting the number of qualified candidates available, <br />making the decision a difficult one. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka provided his personal ranking of <br />candidates: 1) Amy Ihlan, opining that she had earned the right <br />to appointment given her placement in the recently-held elections <br />and the public's trust in her abilities; 2) Gail Pederson, citing her <br />clear capabilities and experienced leadership in the community; <br />and 3) John Goedeke, noting the benefits available in using Mr. <br />Goedeke's expertise during the eleven-week appointment period. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Kough's <br />comments on the quality of the applicant pool; and proceeded to <br />share his personal qualification criteria, not necessarily in order <br />of priority: <br />· proven city service <br />· gender; representative of the community it represents, <br />noting that all three (3) women applicants were more than <br />qualified <br />· community support <br />· ability to come onto Council and work as a team - whether <br />in agreement with them or not <br />· ability to communicate well with Councilmembers and the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.