My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0223
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0223
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:01 AM
Creation date
7/13/2005 4:10:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/23/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting - 02/23/04 <br />Page 20 <br /> <br />10. <br /> <br />Consider a Resolution Authorizing, if Necessary, the <br />Condemnation of Land for the Arona Pond Walking Path <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz reviewed the requested <br />authorization for the City Attorney and staff to use eminent <br />domain, if required, for acquisition of the public right-of-way <br />needed to construct the walking paths around Arona Pond and <br />along Terrace Drive as part of the Arona site redevelopment. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that appraisals had been completed, but that <br />to-date, no agreement had been reached, and it was imperative <br />that construction be initiated in mid-summer, thus necessitating <br />moving forward with the negotiations and acquisition of the <br />property. Mr. Schwartz advised that the property owners had <br />been offered the appraised value of the properties, in addition to <br />an additional $12,000 for additional screening material. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Klausing seconded, adopted Resolution No. <br />10206 entitled, "Resolution Approving the Condemnation of <br />Easements for Walking Paths," ifnecessary. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought clarification as to the intent of <br />the resolution and the authority being provided to staff. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson advised that the resolution provided <br />another option during negotiations, if no agreement could be <br />reached with the two property owners, in order to facilitate the <br />process. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the condemnation process <br />through a mediator or third party, usually a condemnation <br />commission to determine a fair price, with both parties given the <br />right to appeal the commission's decision. It was noted that this <br />pathway was for use as a right-of-way easement. <br /> <br />Further discussion evolved around the intent of the resolution, <br />with City Attorney Anderson clarifying the intent and language <br />of the resolution. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan, Schroeder, Maschka, Kough and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Resolution 10206 <br />Authorizing, if <br />Necessary, the <br />Condemnation of <br />Land for the Arona <br />Pond Walking Path <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.