My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0209
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0209
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:09 AM
Creation date
7/13/2005 4:13:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/9/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting - 02/09/04 <br />Page 25 <br /> <br />adequate spots on the Twin Lakes Business/Property Owner <br />category. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets clarified the number of applications received <br />to-date, including those received yet today prior to the meeting, <br />noting that six people had applied for eight slots or the <br />Business/Property Owner category, and with expanding the "at <br />large" members from one to two; and expanding the "Small <br />Business" category, from two to three, along with Commission <br />Chairs, it would bring the panel to 25 members. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing again sought consensus on the appointment <br />process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka opined his support for appointing all <br />applicants as outlined by Mayor Klausing's recommendation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough expressed opposition to one of the <br />appointees in the Small Business Owner category, opining his <br />preference to vote on individual appointees. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined his lack of support in <br />appointing Dan wall, given his representation through the <br />Roseville Visitor's Association already. <br /> <br />Following further discussion, it was the consensus of <br />Councilmembers to vote on individual appointments. <br /> <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 Victoria Street N <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn sought clarification regarding the appointment <br />process, and referred to Mr. Shardlow's December 12, 2003 <br />correspondence and his recommendations on the selection <br />process, and opined that appointees were being recommended by <br />select Councilmembers on a political basis due to their support of <br />Council candidates. Mr. Kysylyczyn polled Councilmembers on <br />which appointees had provided campaign funds to their re- <br />election campaigns. <br /> <br />Debate ensued among Councilmembers and Mr. Kysylyczyn, <br />with no consensus achieved on the appointment process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.