Laserfiche WebLink
�ase rtUm�er: oy7-� �� Page Three <br />June 4, 1975 ' <br />Planning Commission�and Council in eva7uating these implications. <br />7. In summary, it vrould appear that tne proposal as suggested by the <br />appiicant 41ou1d constitute an improvemz�t to the existing environment <br />of the residentia1 area on �•lilder 5treet and C7e�eland Ave�ue as <br />compared ta the previously approved dev�lopment. 7he visual <br />rela�ionship be�ween the single fami1y area and t�e one story ind�striaT <br />building proposed likewzse, could we11 be an improvement over an <br />apartment projec�. A careful analysis of the ootional iand u�e <br />patterns precipitated by the proposed rezoning G�rill be important <br />in the considerat#ons rela�ing to the proposa] as request�d. <br />5uch opti onal patterns wi 1� be revjev�ied ti�ri �h 1 arger scal e drawi ngs <br />by your consultant at the Public Hearing. <br />� <br />0 <br />� <br />Y <br />❑ <br />