1975_0702_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

/• ' Case iVumber: 89� , 75 June 4, 1975 In this sense, it cou�d g�nerally b represents an asse� to tr�e ex�sting Street to the nor�h. ihe praposal of a comp1eie CU�-CI�-SdC circle at ti�rou�d likely be an advaniage in the Page Tara e construed that �f�e proposal sinq�e fami7y horr�es on 41i.�der a7so contemplates the develop�ent the end of 4Jilder Street v�rf�ic� terms of tf�e t�rn around abiliiy. 4. The dev��o�ment praposal to the sou'th ofi tn� proposed single family housing �otirever, represen'ts a nore controversial issue. 7he o�fice war�house building pr_oposed nas offices on tne north sid� of tt�e bui1di�g and -�he west side. These offices wi11 have ��ro entrances to the bu� l dz ng o-ff of the Cl evel and Aver�u° si de and �hree on - the north side. A landscaped area is provided contiguous to the buiiding on these sides adjacen� to parking prapased in a sing�e roti� on the 4��est and north sides. The proposed structure is a sing7e story, and thus may have some advantages in te rrns of �ts v�sual rei ati onshi p�� the si ngl e-Far�i ly area versus a thre� story a�ar�men-� development as previo�sly proposed. The re7ationship between this pro�osed use and the propased single fami�y area to the north can of course, be better ap�reciated wh�n vieY�ing the larger scale dratirings to be presented at the hearings. + 5. Actual�y the more serious implica�ions of ihe rezoning proposal as submitted are its impac� upon the ul�imate land use both to the east and �he south. The 1909 Comprehensl�te P�an recammended industria� zone �o the southside of Lydia Avenu� as extended east-�rrest to Cleveland Avenue. 7he area to ihe nnrth, including the.lot�er southerly tv�ro thirds of the property in guestion ti•ras recommended for apar�en� development betwe�n Cleveland Avenue and the schaol site to �he �ast. The origianal proposal for apartr�ent development conform quite closely to t�a� concept. 6. It wauld appear that approva� of the I-1 �one at propased in this apQlication, would likely indica�e �he extension of tne industr�al zone fon tF�e property frar� i.yd�a Avenue to the soutl� 1ine of the pro�erty in question and on the eas� side of the proposed indusi- rial area.be�tween tne property in ques��on an� tne pooi si-�e. Tnis of course wou1d affect the uitimate �se of Parcels A and C located to the east of the si�e 111 question, par�icularly as it reia�es to the sou-�herly 356 feet of these parcles. I� these parce�s are canter�z�lated for future industt�ra7 develo�ment then �he question of vehicu�ar circu7ation as Gould re�ate -�o these parcels becom�s of considerabie cancern. 7he de�relop�ent of the souther1y 356 -Feet o-F Parcei A and C for indus�ri al purposes cou7 d�rrell requi re �he development af an eas�--tirest street a� the south line of the property in question which might then be extended southerly to Lydia Ave�ue, or perhaps to the north boundary of thz I-1 zone approximate�y 230 _ fezt south o-f Lydia Avenu� as extended. Larg�r sca3e drativings of these im�lications wi11 be presented a't the hearings to assisst the