Laserfiche WebLink
Case ilumber: ��� J2 - 75 <br />June 4, 197� � <br />,, <br />;,l <br />� Page Tv��o <br />5, l�le are as�rare that the applicant has pr�pared a revised landscaping <br />plan ��h�ci� has been reviewed by.your consultant. Thzs plan <br />appears not to have been submitted to the file, and we sugges� <br />that �h� Cor�mi ssi on and Caunci 7 aslc abou't the di sposi ti an of the <br />revised iandscap� pTan. The previously prepared landscape plan <br />(Urith �he last application) has bezn resubr�itted. In our npinion, <br />ho:�ever, the revised p�an represents a significant improvement, <br />particuiarly as it applies ta th° screening af the par�:ing area <br />con�iguous to Gounty Road 8-2. <br />6. ��le understand it is ihe applicant's intent �io ultimately acquire <br />the single fami�y house ta the south of the property in questio�► <br />and dev�lop a similar apar�men� structure on that property: This <br />would result in a single cons7stently designed developm�nt on the <br />frontage on the west side of Dale Street be�ween E.ovei Avenue and <br />County Road B-2. As you kr�ow, the property across the street to <br />the east is oecupied by a churc�� school. Previous review by.the <br />Planning Carrmziss�on and the Council through the proc�ss o�F the <br />centrai preparaiion and review of �he conpre�hensive p7an have <br />indicated the proper�y is no� appropria�e for single family <br />devel opr�er�t_ <br />:� <br />