Laserfiche WebLink
CIGFNDA SECTION: <br />Hearings <br />REQu�sT �o� cou�vc�L acT;o�v �ATE ' '-'� <br />ORIGINATING DEPT./DIV_: <br />Adm <br />DEP7. HEA�F30VA� . <br />� <br />IiEM NO.: l7EM DESCRIPTIOiV� Sha�er Cantracting Company request for MGR. REVIEWED/RECOMMkENDS: <br />� ��,. d� special use permit at 644, 646 and 656 Cot�.ty Road C <br />The Planning Com�nission at its Jtme 4th mee�ing imanimously recommended denial of <br />Shafer Contxacti.ng Company's reci�st �ar special �ase permit at 644, b46 and 556 <br />Caunty Road C. <br />At�ached is �he Planner's report. <br />Council Acta.on Requested: I�tion (approving) (denying) Shafer Contracting Company's <br />request fox speca.al use perniit ati b44, 64b and 65b <br />County R�ad C. <br />Summary Previaus Actians: <br />1. Initial application for a special use permi� to excavaie property locaterl at 644, 64b <br />and 656 County Raad C was refexred to March &, i974 Planning Conmu.ssion mee�ing. This <br />matter was �abled until corrunent cou.Zd '�e received from Park � Recreation. Corruriit�ee. <br />2. March 25, 1974 Parks F� Recrea�ion Cflrranittee reco�nended the Planning Commission deny the <br />permit and encaurage the City to purchase the propex-ty. <br />3. Apri.l 3, �974 Planning Commission recorrmiended �hat the land proposed to be excavated <br />and the land already excavated (534 Coimty Road C) be purchased and inclua�d in <br />Central Park Plan. <br />�. April 15, 1974 RosevzlZe Cer�tral Park Founclation letter suggests that the permit be <br />deferred for further study and o��ering to purchase the lots, if the price is reason- <br />ab1e. Since tha� tzme the Found.ation has apparently xeconsidered ox wi.thdxawn�their <br />offer �o buy the property. <br />S. May ��>Z, 1974 the Crnmcil denied the appla.cation fox a special use permit. <br />b. June 4, 1975 Planning Commission considered second application fvr special. use permi.t <br />and reco�miend.ed denial. <br />R,eference is also directed ta the City Planner's reports o� March 6, 1974 and June 4, <br />�975, of which he reviews tihe effec�s af the proposed excavati�n. <br />