1975_0702_CC_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

� � Case Number: 9Q5 - 75 �u1y 2, 1975 Pa ge 7wo 4. The variance sought then to the building set--back requirements are -for a 69 foot distance from the east property line and 50 foot distance from ihe north line ot Caunty Road B-2. �. The propased site p7an has been carefully reviewed by your consultants ar�d engineering staff. You will r�ote that the division for a io�al af 41 parking spaces, which exceeds the City's req�iremen� of one space far every 150 square toat net. We suggest this amount of parking wili b� adequate for the Savings and Loan function. In addi��on to the parking spaces of course, the site plan prQVides far a drive-up banking facility of two windows expandab7e to five in the future_ The access to the parking areas and the drive-up facility wi71 be off the private road system to the east and in -�ne future north of the subject property. It �s important to nate that no drive-up or parking lot access is directiy off af County Road B-2. 6. You will note an egress driveway fram the drive-up banking faciiity with a right turn access to County Road 8-2 on1y. Your Director of Public Works has reviewed this propasal and suggests it is appropriate for ihis location. We would suggest however, that the curb line noted to the west af this access point on ta County Road B-2 be moved further north so as to provide•an acceleration lane -From the access point for west--bound iraffic. 7. The second variance sought i5 that of a reduct3on in the 40 faot of space required between parking areas or driveways when contiguos to a residential property. ihe property as. you know, is zoned resident�a� immed�ately to the west of the proper-�y in question, The applicant prapos�s �o develop a future driyeway at this lacation, the west-line of which wou7d be 15 feet from the property line rather than the 40 foat noted in the ordinance. This dri�eway is not propos�d -�o be built at this tir�e, but will be on a 60 fooi easemerrt to be established at t�is time �or future access to ��e Dayton - Hudson property �o the north of �he �roperty in q�estion. 8. The i5 foot set-back is proposed {rather than the 4Q foot) in recognition of the l�lceiihood that the �roperty immediately to the west will ult�mately be developed far business purposes. Yau wiil recall at previous public hearings reiated to the expansion of the bank at the corner of County Road B--F and Fairview Avenue, that this potential was discussed a� length with residents and property owners in the area_ Ail af the vacant lots in this res�derttial subdivision area wiih th� exception of one, as we understan� it, are owned by George Reiling_ Mr. Reil#ng has indicated t�is ultimate desire to utilize t�e properties �'or busi- ness purposes. This of course, could only be dvne on an overall basis involving the consent and cooperation of a71 ihe property owners in the area. We suggest that at an appropriate point in time, the 7and values wili be s�ch that conversion of these prop- erties to highly desirable husiness 7acations will be in tf�� best interest of the property owners (ir�cludirtg the homes} and the City as a whole. We therefore s�gge5t serious consideration o-F the