My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0718
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0718
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:26 AM
Creation date
8/19/2005 3:22:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/18/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 07/18/05 <br />Minutes - Page 24 <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing opined that he was not suggesting that, and <br />recognized, this was a serious issue, but that media and <br />discussion forums were creating a false impression on people <br />and raising their fears that their individual homes were at risk. <br />Mayor Klausing expressed his personal philosophy related to <br />ED, noting that he was not always in agreement with past <br />practice and/or court decisions, but that each situation was <br />unique and needed individual consideration. Mayor Klausing <br />further opined that, while he wasn't averse to having a <br />discussion, he wasn't interested in rehashing the Twin Lakes <br />project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka opined that the recent court decision <br />hadn't changed his mind on the use of ED and the caution he <br />maintained in considering use of ED. Councilmember Maschka <br />clarified his reaction to his perception of Mr. Houck's <br />threatening tone during his public comments. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Maschka, that <br />the recent court decision had not changed his philosophy <br />regarding ED. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson, for reference, reviewed the Supreme <br />Court case, its intent and implications, and confirmation that <br />local governments and policy-makers use jurisprudence and <br />discretion in considering ED, on case-by-case basis, rather than a <br />general policy. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined her desire to have a public policy <br />discussion, and move toward ordinance adoption. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson opined that discussion would be of a <br />legal nature to determine public purpose, and questioned what <br />right a sitting council had to dictate policy to a council elected <br />five years down the road. <br /> <br />07/25/05 Meeting Cancelled <br />Mayor Klausing noted that Councilmembers Kough and <br />Maschka would both be unavailable to attend the scheduled July <br />25, 2005 regular Council meeting, and with review with staff of <br />potential agenda items, was suggesting that the meeting be <br /> <br />7/25/05 <br />Meeting Cancelled <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.