My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:29 AM
Creation date
8/19/2005 3:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/20/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 06/20/05 <br />Minutes - Page 22 <br /> <br />funds would remain after the 25 years of the district for city <br />benefit. <br /> <br />Della Denard <br />Ms. Denard questioned the Council as to their fairness and <br />honesty in representing the citizens who elected them into <br />office. Ms. Denard referenced the recent newspaper poll <br />and responses, and asked the City Council not to go against <br />the wishes ofthe citizens. <br /> <br />Gale Pederson, 929 W Roselawn Avenue <br />Ms. Pederson addressed the need to clean up the <br />contaminated property, not just blight, but a known and <br />identified carcinogen. Ms. Pederson, while not in <br />agreement with the project in its entirety, noted the 730 <br />housing units offered in the development, in addition to <br />other amenities and redevelopment of the entire area. Ms. <br />Pederson opined that her main concern was in cleaning up <br />contaminants along the lake and park to eliminate potential <br />health hazards and for benefits for future generations. Ms. <br />Pederson asked citizens to look at the positives, not just the <br />negatives; and opined that truck bodies do not make good <br />natural habitat. <br /> <br />Tim Kotecki, 3078 Mount Ridge Road <br />Mr. Kotecki reviewed statistics and demographics he had <br />researched related to existing retail in the area. Mr. Kotecki <br />summarized his concerns by asking if citizens wanted to <br />invest their future tax dollars for additional retail <br />development; and respectfully asked the City Council to <br />vote "no" on the financing proposal for this project. <br /> <br />Craig Christenson, 2585 Wheeler Avenue <br />Mr. Christenson opined that he didn't support TIF; and that <br />while he could support a project, not necessarily this one. <br /> <br />Mr. Christenson referenced Exhibit Q related to the <br />LEADS process and rating system; questioned whether the <br />proposed language was enforceable; questioned items <br />related to the State Energy Code and the less-stringent <br />commercial than residential code. Mr. Christenson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.