My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:29 AM
Creation date
8/19/2005 3:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/20/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 06/20/05 <br />Minutes - Page 25 <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough questioned Section 5.7 of the <br />Development Agreement and whether the developer could <br />replace office and retail with rental housing without <br />Council approval, and recommended that this language be <br />deleted. <br />Further discussion and clarification included the LEAD <br />process; environmental waste, lighting and energy <br />conservation; coordination with area agencies (i.e., Rice <br />Creek Watershed District and the Minnesota Pollution <br />Control Agency) to address LEAD Certification and <br />environmental issues; and existing lighting codes. <br /> <br />[3.2a] A Resolution Relating to the Decertification of a <br />Portion of Tax Increment Financing District No. 11; <br />and a Portion of Hazardous Substance Subdistrict No. <br />11A <br />[3.2a and b] Schroeder moved, Maschka seconded, <br />adoption of Resolution No.1 0316A entitled, "A Resolution <br />Relating to the Decertification of a Portion of Tax <br />Increment Financing District No.ll and a Portion of <br />hazardous Substance Subdistrict No. lIA;" and adoption of <br />Resolution No. 10316B entitled, "A Resolution Restating <br />the Development Program for Development District No.1; <br />Creating Tax Increment Financing District No. 17; and <br />Hazardous Substance Subdistrict No. 17 A; and Adopting <br />Tax Increment Financing Plans Relating Thereto." <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough stated that his position had not <br />changed and speaking in opposition to the motion based on <br />the aging population in Roseville representing fixed income <br />households; and potential hardships to those residents. <br />Councilmember Kough opined that the only way he could <br />support the redevelopment of Twin Lakes would be <br />without a "big box" retailer; inclusion of small retailers; <br />and encouraging current landowners to clean up their <br />properties that they had previously purchased on <br />speculation. Councilmember Kough stated that he had <br />taken an oath to support his constituents, and believed that <br />the majority of the community was opposed to the project, <br />specifically the "big box" retailer. <br /> <br />Resolution 10316A <br />Decertification of a <br />Portion of TIF <br />District No. 11; & <br />Portion of <br />Hazardous <br />Substance <br />Subdistrict No.11A <br /> <br />Resolution 10316B <br />Restating <br />Development <br />Program <br />Dev Dist 1 <br />Creating Dist 17 & <br />Subdistrict 17A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.