My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:29 AM
Creation date
8/19/2005 3:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/20/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />VOTERS AGAINST THE TWIN LAKES PROJECT <br />SOME COMMENTS <br /> <br />· Why doesn't the city council help subsidize our property taxes? <br />· The city and citizens of Roseville will pay for not benefit from this-only the <br />developers will. <br />· It is ludicrous and fiscally irresponsible for a city council to agree to pay a for <br />profit company to develop private property. The whole process has been a fiasco <br />from the start restricting proposals from only onecompany. This is not the <br />democratic process. <br />· We don't need any more big retail development. Build some single family homes <br />and make more part space. <br />· Taxpayer funded subsidies for big business at the expense of Roseville residents <br />is WRONG! Please send this notice to every Roseville resident. <br />· No big box. Too much traffic & retail now. Tranquility lost for nothing but <br />trash. <br />· Put this proposal on the ballot and let Roseville residents VOTE on it. It won't <br />pass because as it stands it STINKS. <br />· Property taxes are high enough. Roseville DOES NOT NEED any more retail. <br />· Do the 3 members of the council in favor of big box care at all about how the <br />majority of Roseville residents feel? If so, they'd have a referendum vote and <br />listen to those that elected them rather than corporate developers that live outside <br />Roseville. <br />· I'm willing to give this small donation to help fight the misuse of my taxes for the <br />misappropriation of private property. <br />. Listen to the citizens of Roseville. The majority of them are against this <br />development. Reverse your decision and vote this down. <br />· I need my money for medical and living expenses not to pay taxes for rich <br />development. We all pay our own way. <br />· We don't need anymore retail in Roseville. <br />· Hang in there, Amy Ihlan. We support you. <br />· Our taxes are too high as it is without adding to the burden. Let the developer use <br />his own money instead of ours. We should recall the people who want to push it <br />through without voter approval. <br />. Property by eminent domain is not right. <br />· Against big box, too dense in housing, too much traffic, use TIP dollars to <br />pollution clean up then offer popery to other developers, not Rottlund. <br />· We do not need a big box or more retail. <br />· No more commercial in Roseville. We already have 4X the average household. <br />· This is not representative government. I simply can't understand why some <br />council members support this plan and choose to ignore the citizens. It's become <br />and unfortunate show of stubbornness. <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.