CC_Minutes_2005_0620 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

· We would like to see Roseville allow other developers to offer alternative proposal-projects that are consistent with the city's Master Plan. Save the wildlife areas-the trees, the wetlands, the lands and the wildlife. Not a filtering plan for Roseville. · City Council should spend more time listening to the resident's wishes on all matters. · This definitely not good plan for the people of Roseville. We strongly oppose it. · I do not think we need any more shopping places. I do not want my taxes to be increased for this. · Its unfortunate the people who vote our elected official in a re becoming the voices you don't listen to anymore. Developers are all about $$. The environment is polluted because of them. We don't need more retail!! The Council isn't listening to anyone but the one developer. · This prime piecc of property should not be a gift to the land barons. Must be a better plan. Must be a better plan developing revenue for the CITY. · Roseville is giving away with this development too much. · Too many housing units. Not tax inc. financing. The tax we get now is better than none, single family homes would be nice. · Tax dollars should not be spent on development. · I cannot believe the decisions this council is making. There should be a city wide VOTE. . Dean Maschka was amazed at the size of the new Target store frbm Hiway 36. I wonder how he'll react to the development at Twin Lakes. These people don't have a clue. · Business should pay for it's own development and taxes like homeowners do. · What was the City plmming to do with the tax money? · Losing two acres of parkland is also appalling!! · I wonder what kind of a kickback Craig, Dean, and Greg are getting? . Deal should not bc exclusive nor should it be subsidized. Primarily disapprove the process. . Tell Mr. Maschka, Mr. Klausing and Mr. Schroeder that there is no such thing as "free money". · Do not think we should have to pay for businesses to develop through TlF funds. Have more than one firm offer plans for area. · I would like to help halt this corporate welfare. · We are opposed to public subsidy for development, use of eminent domain to size private property, and are concerned the development will harm Langton Lake mld exacerbate the TCE problem. · Disapprove of tax burden aJ1d taking private property by law. · (I) Roseville is PRIME location for developer-they do not need tax bread (25 years) to be profitable. (2) How can big box retail fit in wi residential. Who would choose to live there? · We would like a Costco closer to Roseville, but not in ml already congested area. · Roseville doesn't need this development aJ1d should look for more creative us of this land. Rottland' s use makes us look like every other one. 2