My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0620
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:29 AM
Creation date
8/19/2005 3:26:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/20/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />· Don't want city to pick only one contractor. City Council should not have last say <br />so. <br />· There are better ways to spend out tax dollars. The city is giving too much to one <br />private developer. <br />· We think this is a horrible misuse of taxpayer money and trust. <br />· We do not believe in subsidizing private development when there are other <br />avenues for them. In my opinion we do not need any more shopping centeres in <br />Roseville. <br />· Who is the developer? All support? 25 years? NO. <br />. We do not need any more shopping centers!! <br />. Using tax increment financing for this development is irresponsible: As is the <br />concept of the whole project. <br />· Roseville used to have a reputation as a quality place to live. Do we want to <br />become the best place to shop instead? <br />· We already pay too many taxes. We own a small business. No one in <br />government is giving us a tax break . <br />· No more retail. People in debt too much. <br />· We do not approve of this no taxes for 25 years on this development plan. <br />· I am against eminent domain practices and we should not be supporting <br />contractors with our tax money. If they can't do it on their own-GET RID OF <br />THEM. <br />· AITordable housing would be a better choice. Listen to your Roseville citizens. <br />. We simply cannot afford a venture of this type. We don't need another big box <br />store. How about having Roseville residents vote on this? Our officials don't <br />seem to be listening to us. <br />· No to retail. Roseville needs upscale housing. <br />· Why don't those 3 ding a lings on the council listen to the average normal <br />citizens. I don't get it. <br />· Don't need more senior housing. <br />· Traffic increase is too much. We do not need more retail. <br />· We are concerned and disappointed over this costly venture. There was never a <br />need case built lor the project. This will prove to be a shortsighted move with <br />long range negative impacts on our neighborhood. <br />· The bulk of the city council are not listening to the public. Thank you lor all your <br />doing to help the public to be heard. <br />· Too much retail and traffic. <br />· We have too much retail-should not subsidize retail development -Costco <br />· Too many empty areas in mall now. Don't need more. <br />· We do not need another shopping center. <br />· There are already enough retail options in Roseville (times 2). <br />· We have enough big box stores. If the land and location values are so great, the <br />developer should pay for it rather than Roseville Citizens. NO TIF. <br />· We do not need any more shopping in this area. The traffic is terrible in this <br />area. <br /> <br />3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.